TY - JOUR

T1 - Protecting tropical forests from the rapid expansion of rubber using carbon payments

AU - Warren-Thomas, Eleanor M.

AU - Edwards, David P.

AU - Bebber, Daniel P.

AU - Chhang, Phourin

AU - Diment, Alex N.

AU - Evans, Tom D.

AU - Lambrick, Frances H.

AU - Maxwell, James F.

AU - Nut, Menghor

AU - O’Kelly, Hannah J.

AU - Theilade, Ida

AU - Dolman, Paul M.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Expansion of Hevea brasiliensis rubber plantations is a resurgent driver of deforestation, carbon emissions, and biodiversity loss in Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian rubber extent is massive, equivalent to 67% of oil palm, with rapid further expansion predicted. Results-based carbon finance could dis-incentivise forest conversion to rubber, but efficacy will be limited unless payments match, or at least approach, the costs of avoided deforestation. These include opportunity costs (timber and rubber profits), plus carbon finance scheme setup (transaction) and implementation costs. Using comprehensive Cambodian forest data, exploring scenarios of selective logging and conversion, and assuming land-use choice is based on net present value, we find that carbon prices of $30–$51 per tCO2 are needed to break even against costs, higher than those currently paid on carbon markets or through carbon funds. To defend forests from rubber, either carbon prices must be increased, or other strategies are needed, such as corporate zero-deforestation pledges, and governmental regulation and enforcement of forest protection.

AB - Expansion of Hevea brasiliensis rubber plantations is a resurgent driver of deforestation, carbon emissions, and biodiversity loss in Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian rubber extent is massive, equivalent to 67% of oil palm, with rapid further expansion predicted. Results-based carbon finance could dis-incentivise forest conversion to rubber, but efficacy will be limited unless payments match, or at least approach, the costs of avoided deforestation. These include opportunity costs (timber and rubber profits), plus carbon finance scheme setup (transaction) and implementation costs. Using comprehensive Cambodian forest data, exploring scenarios of selective logging and conversion, and assuming land-use choice is based on net present value, we find that carbon prices of $30–$51 per tCO2 are needed to break even against costs, higher than those currently paid on carbon markets or through carbon funds. To defend forests from rubber, either carbon prices must be increased, or other strategies are needed, such as corporate zero-deforestation pledges, and governmental regulation and enforcement of forest protection.

UR - https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41467-018-03287-9/MediaObjects/41467_2018_3287_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

U2 - 10.1038/s41467-018-03287-9

DO - 10.1038/s41467-018-03287-9

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Nature Communications

JF - Nature Communications

SN - 2041-1723

IS - 1

M1 - 911

ER -