StandardStandard

Reminiscence therapy for dementia: an abridged Cochrane systematic review of the evidence from randomized controlled trials. / O' Philbin, Laura; Woods, Bob; Farrell, Emma M et al.
Yn: Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, Cyfrol 18, Rhif 9, 09.2018, t. 715-727.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

O' Philbin, L, Woods, B, Farrell, EM, Spector, AE & Orrell, M 2018, 'Reminiscence therapy for dementia: an abridged Cochrane systematic review of the evidence from randomized controlled trials', Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, cyfrol. 18, rhif 9, tt. 715-727. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2018.1509709

APA

O' Philbin, L., Woods, B., Farrell, E. M., Spector, A. E., & Orrell, M. (2018). Reminiscence therapy for dementia: an abridged Cochrane systematic review of the evidence from randomized controlled trials. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 18(9), 715-727. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2018.1509709

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

O' Philbin L, Woods B, Farrell EM, Spector AE, Orrell M. Reminiscence therapy for dementia: an abridged Cochrane systematic review of the evidence from randomized controlled trials. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2018 Medi;18(9):715-727. Epub 2018 Awst 28. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1509709

Author

O' Philbin, Laura ; Woods, Bob ; Farrell, Emma M et al. / Reminiscence therapy for dementia : an abridged Cochrane systematic review of the evidence from randomized controlled trials. Yn: Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2018 ; Cyfrol 18, Rhif 9. tt. 715-727.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reminiscence therapy for dementia

T2 - an abridged Cochrane systematic review of the evidence from randomized controlled trials

AU - O' Philbin, Laura

AU - Woods, Bob

AU - Farrell, Emma M

AU - Spector, Aimee E

AU - Orrell, Martin

N1 - L O’ Philbin is supported by a KESS 2 (European Social Fund: Knowledge Economy Skills Scholarship) PhD studentship [80815].

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Reminiscence therapy (RT) is a popular psychosocial intervention widely used in dementia care. It involves discussion of past events and experiences, using tangible prompts to evoke memories or stimulate conversation. Areas covered: The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of RT for people with dementia. It includes studies from the specialized register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (ALOIS). Searches yielded 185 records of which 22 (n = 1972) were eligible for inclusion. The meta-analysis comprised of data from 16 studies (n = 1749 participants). The review included four large multicenter high-quality studies and several smaller studies of reasonable quality. Outcomes of interest were quality of life, communication, depression, and cognition at posttreatment and later follow-up. Expert commentary: RT has the potential to improve psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia. Effects are small and can be inconsistent, varying across intervention modality and setting. Individual approaches were associated with improved cognition and mood. Group approaches were linked to improved communication. The impact on quality of life appeared most promising in care home settings. Diversity in reminiscence approaches makes it difficult to compare them, and the field would benefit from the development, evaluation, use, and sharing of standardized approaches.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Reminiscence therapy (RT) is a popular psychosocial intervention widely used in dementia care. It involves discussion of past events and experiences, using tangible prompts to evoke memories or stimulate conversation. Areas covered: The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of RT for people with dementia. It includes studies from the specialized register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (ALOIS). Searches yielded 185 records of which 22 (n = 1972) were eligible for inclusion. The meta-analysis comprised of data from 16 studies (n = 1749 participants). The review included four large multicenter high-quality studies and several smaller studies of reasonable quality. Outcomes of interest were quality of life, communication, depression, and cognition at posttreatment and later follow-up. Expert commentary: RT has the potential to improve psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia. Effects are small and can be inconsistent, varying across intervention modality and setting. Individual approaches were associated with improved cognition and mood. Group approaches were linked to improved communication. The impact on quality of life appeared most promising in care home settings. Diversity in reminiscence approaches makes it difficult to compare them, and the field would benefit from the development, evaluation, use, and sharing of standardized approaches.

U2 - 10.1080/14737175.2018.1509709

DO - 10.1080/14737175.2018.1509709

M3 - Article

C2 - 30092689

VL - 18

SP - 715

EP - 727

JO - Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

JF - Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

SN - 1473-7175

IS - 9

ER -