StandardStandard

Response of soil phosphorus fractions and fluxes to different vegetation restoration types in a subtropical mountain ecosystem. / Fu, Denggao; Wu, Xiaoni; Duan, Changqun et al.
Yn: Catena, Cyfrol 193, 104663, 01.10.2020.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Fu D, Wu X, Duan C, Chadwick DR, Jones DL. Response of soil phosphorus fractions and fluxes to different vegetation restoration types in a subtropical mountain ecosystem. Catena. 2020 Hyd 1;193:104663. Epub 2020 Mai 16. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104663

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response of soil phosphorus fractions and fluxes to different vegetation restoration types in a subtropical mountain ecosystem

AU - Fu, Denggao

AU - Wu, Xiaoni

AU - Duan, Changqun

AU - Chadwick, David R.

AU - Jones, Davey L.

N1 - Validated without post-print. Added without post-print and no response to repeated requests for version.

PY - 2020/10/1

Y1 - 2020/10/1

N2 - Soil phosphorus (P) improvement is one of the important aims of vegetation restoration. However, the effects of different vegetation restoration types on soil P cycling and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Together with vegetation structure and soil properties, we measured the soil P fractions and P transformation rates to evaluate the characteristics of ecologically relevant soil P fraction distributions and their dynamics for the most common vegetation restoration types in a subtropical mountain ecosystem (i.e., PF, Pinus forest; EF, Eucalyptus forest; SL, shrubland; and NSF, natural secondary forest). We found that water-extractable inorganic P (Pi), organic P (Po), and acid phosphatase activity (APA) were significantly higher in NSF than those in the other vegetation types (P < 0.01), together with the highest gross P mineralization rate (Pmin) and net P immobilization rate (Pimm), suggesting biological processes played a more important role in soil P cycling in the NSF. In contrast, the soil showed the lowest values of Pmin, Pimm, and APA in the EF compared to NSF and PF (P < 0.05), together with the highest P loss and the higher net P solubilization rate (Psol), indicating the greater importance of soil geochemical processes. Compared with the NSF and EF, geochemical and biological processes co-regulated soil P cycling in the PF and SL. However, the soil in the PF displayed higher P fluxes (Pmin, Pimm, Psol, and P loss) than those in the SL (P < 0.05), suggesting the soil had higher P flux magnitudes in the PF. Results of correlation analyses showed that the soil microbial community structure and activity played a more important role than plant community attributes and soil physicochemical properties in soil P fraction distribution and fluxes. In conclusion, soil P fraction distributions and their fluxes can be significantly influenced by vegetation restoration types. Land management strategies focusing on restoration of the soil microbial community may enhance soil P cycling and improve soil quality.

AB - Soil phosphorus (P) improvement is one of the important aims of vegetation restoration. However, the effects of different vegetation restoration types on soil P cycling and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Together with vegetation structure and soil properties, we measured the soil P fractions and P transformation rates to evaluate the characteristics of ecologically relevant soil P fraction distributions and their dynamics for the most common vegetation restoration types in a subtropical mountain ecosystem (i.e., PF, Pinus forest; EF, Eucalyptus forest; SL, shrubland; and NSF, natural secondary forest). We found that water-extractable inorganic P (Pi), organic P (Po), and acid phosphatase activity (APA) were significantly higher in NSF than those in the other vegetation types (P < 0.01), together with the highest gross P mineralization rate (Pmin) and net P immobilization rate (Pimm), suggesting biological processes played a more important role in soil P cycling in the NSF. In contrast, the soil showed the lowest values of Pmin, Pimm, and APA in the EF compared to NSF and PF (P < 0.05), together with the highest P loss and the higher net P solubilization rate (Psol), indicating the greater importance of soil geochemical processes. Compared with the NSF and EF, geochemical and biological processes co-regulated soil P cycling in the PF and SL. However, the soil in the PF displayed higher P fluxes (Pmin, Pimm, Psol, and P loss) than those in the SL (P < 0.05), suggesting the soil had higher P flux magnitudes in the PF. Results of correlation analyses showed that the soil microbial community structure and activity played a more important role than plant community attributes and soil physicochemical properties in soil P fraction distribution and fluxes. In conclusion, soil P fraction distributions and their fluxes can be significantly influenced by vegetation restoration types. Land management strategies focusing on restoration of the soil microbial community may enhance soil P cycling and improve soil quality.

KW - Phosphorus cycling

KW - Phosphorus transformation rate

KW - Soil microbial properties

KW - Organic phosphorus

KW - Plant community properties

U2 - 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104663

DO - 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104663

M3 - Article

VL - 193

JO - Catena

JF - Catena

SN - 0341-8162

M1 - 104663

ER -