Rewilding Forestry
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
StandardStandard
Yn: Forest Policy and Economics, Cyfrol 109, 101996, 12.2019.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Rewilding Forestry
AU - Dandy, Norman
AU - Wynne-Jones, Sophie
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Rewilding has become highly popular amongst conservationists, ecologists, geographers and others, but interest is considerably less obvious amongst foresters. Whilst overall the amount of research focused on rewilding continues to grow rapidly, very few papers published within core forestry journals engage with the concept. In this commentary, we offer some potential explanations for this lack of engagement which include rewilding’s early focus on animals (especially carnivores), its conceptual overlap with restoration, and the potentially profound implications for forestry practice and policy consequent to embracing the approach. Despite these issues and barriers, we argue for greater research attention to be given to rewilding by forest scientists. Increased interaction has the potential for significant mutual benefits. Foresters can bring a range of established insights to the debate that would inform key aspects of contemporary rewilding policy and practice, such as ecological succession dynamics and silvicultural approaches to transition. In response, rewilding has considerable potential for refreshing and reframing aspects of forestry policy and practice, including approaches to resilience.
AB - Rewilding has become highly popular amongst conservationists, ecologists, geographers and others, but interest is considerably less obvious amongst foresters. Whilst overall the amount of research focused on rewilding continues to grow rapidly, very few papers published within core forestry journals engage with the concept. In this commentary, we offer some potential explanations for this lack of engagement which include rewilding’s early focus on animals (especially carnivores), its conceptual overlap with restoration, and the potentially profound implications for forestry practice and policy consequent to embracing the approach. Despite these issues and barriers, we argue for greater research attention to be given to rewilding by forest scientists. Increased interaction has the potential for significant mutual benefits. Foresters can bring a range of established insights to the debate that would inform key aspects of contemporary rewilding policy and practice, such as ecological succession dynamics and silvicultural approaches to transition. In response, rewilding has considerable potential for refreshing and reframing aspects of forestry policy and practice, including approaches to resilience.
KW - Forest restoration
KW - Forest science
KW - Forestry journals
KW - Rewilding
U2 - 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101996
DO - 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101996
M3 - Article
VL - 109
JO - Forest Policy and Economics
JF - Forest Policy and Economics
SN - 1389-9341
M1 - 101996
ER -