Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India. / Raveesh, B.N.; Pathare, S.; Noorthoorn, Eric O. et al.
Yn: Indian Journal of Psychiatry, Cyfrol 58, Rhif 6, 27.12.2016, t. 221-229.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Raveesh, BN, Pathare, S, Noorthoorn, EO, Gowda, GS, Lepping, P & Bunders-Aelen, JGF 2016, 'Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India', Indian Journal of Psychiatry, cyfrol. 58, rhif 6, tt. 221-229. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.196847

APA

Raveesh, B. N., Pathare, S., Noorthoorn, E. O., Gowda, G. S., Lepping, P., & Bunders-Aelen, J. G. F. (2016). Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 58(6), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.196847

CBE

Raveesh BN, Pathare S, Noorthoorn EO, Gowda GS, Lepping P, Bunders-Aelen JGF. 2016. Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 58(6):221-229. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.196847

MLA

Raveesh, B.N. et al. "Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India". Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2016, 58(6). 221-229. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.196847

VancouverVancouver

Raveesh BN, Pathare S, Noorthoorn EO, Gowda GS, Lepping P, Bunders-Aelen JGF. Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2016 Rhag 27;58(6):221-229. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.196847

Author

Raveesh, B.N. ; Pathare, S. ; Noorthoorn, Eric O. et al. / Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India. Yn: Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2016 ; Cyfrol 58, Rhif 6. tt. 221-229.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India

AU - Raveesh, B.N.

AU - Pathare, S.

AU - Noorthoorn, Eric O.

AU - Gowda, Guru S.

AU - Lepping, Peter

AU - Bunders-Aelen, J.G.F.

PY - 2016/12/27

Y1 - 2016/12/27

N2 - Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess attitudes of Indian psychiatrists and caregivers toward coercion.Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at the Department of Psychiatry, Krishna Rajendra Hospital, Mysore, India. Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS), a 15-item questionnaire, was administered to self-selected psychiatrists across India and caregivers from Mysore to measure attitudes on coercion. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and investigating differences in subgroups by means of Chi-square test, Student's t-test, and analysis of variance. Reliability of the SACS was tested in this Indian sample.Results: A total of 210 psychiatrists and 210 caregivers participated in the study. Both groups agreed that coercion was related to scarce resources, security concerns, and harm reduction. Both groups agreed that coercion is necessary, but not as treatment. Older caregivers and male experienced psychiatrists considered coercion related to scarce resources to violate patient integrity. All participants considered coercion necessary for protection in dangerous situations. Professionals and caregivers significantly disagreed on most items. The reliability of the SACS was reasonable to good among the psychiatrists group, but not in the caregiver group (alpha 0.58 vs. 0.07).Conclusion: Caregivers and psychiatrists felt that the lack of resources is one of the reasons for coercion. Furthermore, they felt that the need on early identification of aggressive behavior, interventions to reduce aggressiveness, empowering patients, improving hospital resources, staff training in verbal de-escalation techniques is essential. There is an urgent need in the standardized operating procedure in the use of coercive measure in Indian mental health setting.

AB - Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess attitudes of Indian psychiatrists and caregivers toward coercion.Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at the Department of Psychiatry, Krishna Rajendra Hospital, Mysore, India. Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS), a 15-item questionnaire, was administered to self-selected psychiatrists across India and caregivers from Mysore to measure attitudes on coercion. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and investigating differences in subgroups by means of Chi-square test, Student's t-test, and analysis of variance. Reliability of the SACS was tested in this Indian sample.Results: A total of 210 psychiatrists and 210 caregivers participated in the study. Both groups agreed that coercion was related to scarce resources, security concerns, and harm reduction. Both groups agreed that coercion is necessary, but not as treatment. Older caregivers and male experienced psychiatrists considered coercion related to scarce resources to violate patient integrity. All participants considered coercion necessary for protection in dangerous situations. Professionals and caregivers significantly disagreed on most items. The reliability of the SACS was reasonable to good among the psychiatrists group, but not in the caregiver group (alpha 0.58 vs. 0.07).Conclusion: Caregivers and psychiatrists felt that the lack of resources is one of the reasons for coercion. Furthermore, they felt that the need on early identification of aggressive behavior, interventions to reduce aggressiveness, empowering patients, improving hospital resources, staff training in verbal de-escalation techniques is essential. There is an urgent need in the standardized operating procedure in the use of coercive measure in Indian mental health setting.

KW - Attitude

KW - Caregiver

KW - Coercion

KW - Staff

U2 - 10.4103/0019-5545.196847

DO - 10.4103/0019-5545.196847

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 221

EP - 229

JO - Indian Journal of Psychiatry

JF - Indian Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0019-5545

IS - 6

ER -