Sustainability reporting beyond the business case and its impact on sustainability performance: UK evidence

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Sustainability reporting beyond the business case and its impact on sustainability performance: UK evidence. / Al-Shaer, Habiba; Hussainey, Khaled.
Yn: Journal of Environmental Management, 01.06.2022.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Al-Shaer H, Hussainey K. Sustainability reporting beyond the business case and its impact on sustainability performance: UK evidence. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022 Meh 1;114883. Epub 2022 Maw 11. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114883

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainability reporting beyond the business case and its impact on sustainability performance: UK evidence

AU - Al-Shaer, Habiba

AU - Hussainey, Khaled

PY - 2022/6/1

Y1 - 2022/6/1

N2 - We explore Landrum and Ohsowski (2018)'s development model, which positions each company's sustainability reporting with multiple worldviews of corporate sustainability. We investigate the impact of sustainability report communicative actions on corporate sustainability performance. We argue that companies that comply with the reporting guidelines and adopt the business case for corporate sustainability may not capture all sustainability aspects, and therefore may not have a real impact on sustainability performance. Employing a computer-based textual analysis on a sample of UK firms that published sustainability reports during the period 2014–2018, we find that sustainability reports that communicate the message that firms understand sustainability to mean maintaining production and consumption patterns within resources capacity of the planet and coexisting in harmony with nature are likely to have a positive effect on sustainability performance. On the other hand, communicating compliance and the business-centred approach as their understanding of sustainability will negatively affect sustainability performance. Our findings offer important implications for companies who need to change their approach towards sustainability reporting and shift from the business case approach to advance to the next stage of sustainability reporting which should guide corporate decisions and actions.

AB - We explore Landrum and Ohsowski (2018)'s development model, which positions each company's sustainability reporting with multiple worldviews of corporate sustainability. We investigate the impact of sustainability report communicative actions on corporate sustainability performance. We argue that companies that comply with the reporting guidelines and adopt the business case for corporate sustainability may not capture all sustainability aspects, and therefore may not have a real impact on sustainability performance. Employing a computer-based textual analysis on a sample of UK firms that published sustainability reports during the period 2014–2018, we find that sustainability reports that communicate the message that firms understand sustainability to mean maintaining production and consumption patterns within resources capacity of the planet and coexisting in harmony with nature are likely to have a positive effect on sustainability performance. On the other hand, communicating compliance and the business-centred approach as their understanding of sustainability will negatively affect sustainability performance. Our findings offer important implications for companies who need to change their approach towards sustainability reporting and shift from the business case approach to advance to the next stage of sustainability reporting which should guide corporate decisions and actions.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114883

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114883

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

M1 - 114883

ER -