Temporal Patterns of Honeybee Foraging in a Diverse Floral Landscape Revealed Using Pollen DNA Metabarcoding of Honey

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Temporal Patterns of Honeybee Foraging in a Diverse Floral Landscape Revealed Using Pollen DNA Metabarcoding of Honey. / Jones, Laura; Lowe, Abigail; Ford, Col R. et al.
Yn: Integrative and Comparative Biology, Cyfrol 62, Rhif 2, 01.08.2022, t. 199-210.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Jones, L, Lowe, A, Ford, CR, Creer, S & de Vere, N 2022, 'Temporal Patterns of Honeybee Foraging in a Diverse Floral Landscape Revealed Using Pollen DNA Metabarcoding of Honey', Integrative and Comparative Biology, cyfrol. 62, rhif 2, tt. 199-210. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icac029

APA

Jones, L., Lowe, A., Ford, C. R., Creer, S., & de Vere, N. (2022). Temporal Patterns of Honeybee Foraging in a Diverse Floral Landscape Revealed Using Pollen DNA Metabarcoding of Honey. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 62(2), 199-210. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icac029

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Jones L, Lowe A, Ford CR, Creer S, de Vere N. Temporal Patterns of Honeybee Foraging in a Diverse Floral Landscape Revealed Using Pollen DNA Metabarcoding of Honey. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2022 Awst 1;62(2):199-210. Epub 2022 Mai 10. doi: 10.1093/icb/icac029

Author

Jones, Laura ; Lowe, Abigail ; Ford, Col R. et al. / Temporal Patterns of Honeybee Foraging in a Diverse Floral Landscape Revealed Using Pollen DNA Metabarcoding of Honey. Yn: Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2022 ; Cyfrol 62, Rhif 2. tt. 199-210.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporal Patterns of Honeybee Foraging in a Diverse Floral Landscape Revealed Using Pollen DNA Metabarcoding of Honey

AU - Jones, Laura

AU - Lowe, Abigail

AU - Ford, Col R.

AU - Creer, Simon

AU - de Vere, Natasha

PY - 2022/8/1

Y1 - 2022/8/1

N2 - Understanding the plants pollinators use through the year is vital to support pollinator populations and mitigate for declines in floral resources due to habitat loss. DNA metabarcoding allows the temporal picture of nectar and pollen foraging to be examined in detail. Here, we use DNA metabarcoding to examine the forage use of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) within a florally diverse landscape within the UK, documenting the key forage plants used and seasonal progression over two years. The total number of plant taxa detected in the honey was 120, but only 16 of these were found with a high relative read abundance of DNA, across the main foraging months (April–September). Only a small proportion of the available flowering genera in the landscape were used by the honeybees. The greatest relative read abundance came from native or near-native plants, including Rubus spp., Trifolium repens, the Maleae tribe including Crataegus, Malus, and Cotoneaster, and Hedera helix. Tree species were important forage in the spring months, followed by increased use of herbs and shrubs later in the foraging season. Garden habitat increased the taxon richness of native, near-native and horticultural plants found in the honey. Although horticultural plants were rarely found abundantly within the honey samples, they may be important for increasing nutritional diversity of the pollen forage

AB - Understanding the plants pollinators use through the year is vital to support pollinator populations and mitigate for declines in floral resources due to habitat loss. DNA metabarcoding allows the temporal picture of nectar and pollen foraging to be examined in detail. Here, we use DNA metabarcoding to examine the forage use of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) within a florally diverse landscape within the UK, documenting the key forage plants used and seasonal progression over two years. The total number of plant taxa detected in the honey was 120, but only 16 of these were found with a high relative read abundance of DNA, across the main foraging months (April–September). Only a small proportion of the available flowering genera in the landscape were used by the honeybees. The greatest relative read abundance came from native or near-native plants, including Rubus spp., Trifolium repens, the Maleae tribe including Crataegus, Malus, and Cotoneaster, and Hedera helix. Tree species were important forage in the spring months, followed by increased use of herbs and shrubs later in the foraging season. Garden habitat increased the taxon richness of native, near-native and horticultural plants found in the honey. Although horticultural plants were rarely found abundantly within the honey samples, they may be important for increasing nutritional diversity of the pollen forage

U2 - 10.1093/icb/icac029

DO - 10.1093/icb/icac029

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 199

EP - 210

JO - Integrative and Comparative Biology

JF - Integrative and Comparative Biology

SN - 1540-7063

IS - 2

ER -