TEOS: A framework for constructing operational definitions of medication adherence based on Timelines – Events – Objectives – Sources
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
StandardStandard
Yn: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Cyfrol 87, Rhif 6, 06.2021, t. 2521-2533.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - TEOS: A framework for constructing operational definitions of medication adherence based on Timelines – Events – Objectives – Sources
AU - Dima, Alexandra L.
AU - Allemann, Samuel S.
AU - Dunbar-Jacobs, Jacqueline
AU - Hughes, Dyfrig
AU - Vrijens, Bernard
AU - Wilson, Ira
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Aim: Managing adherence to medications is a priority for health systems worldwide. Adherence research is accumulating, yet the quality of the evidence is reduced by various methodological limitations. In particular, the heterogeneity and low accuracy of adherence measures have been highlighted in many literature reviews. Recent consensus-based guidelines advise on best practices in defining adherence (ABC) and reporting of empirical studies (EMERGE). While these guidelines highlight the importance of operational definitions in adherence measurement; such definitions are rarely included in study reports. To support researchers in their measurement decisions, we developed a structured approach to formulate operational definitions of adherence. Methods: A group of adherence and research methodology experts used theoretical, methodological and practical considerations to examine the process of applying adherence definitions to various research settings, questions and data sources. Consensus was reached through iterative reviewing of discussion summaries and framework versions. Results: We introduce TEOS, a four-component framework to guide the operationalization of adherence concepts: 1) describe treatment as four simultaneous interdependent timelines (recommended and actual use, conditional on prescribing and dispensing); 2) locate four key events along these timelines to delimit the three ABC phases (first and last recommended use, first and last actual use); 3) revisit study objectives and design to finetune research questions and assess measurement validity and reliability needs, and 4) select data sources (e.g., electronic monitoring, self-report, electronic healthcare databases) that best address measurement needs.Conclusion: Using the TEOS framework when designing research and reporting explicitly on these components can improve measurement quality.
AB - Aim: Managing adherence to medications is a priority for health systems worldwide. Adherence research is accumulating, yet the quality of the evidence is reduced by various methodological limitations. In particular, the heterogeneity and low accuracy of adherence measures have been highlighted in many literature reviews. Recent consensus-based guidelines advise on best practices in defining adherence (ABC) and reporting of empirical studies (EMERGE). While these guidelines highlight the importance of operational definitions in adherence measurement; such definitions are rarely included in study reports. To support researchers in their measurement decisions, we developed a structured approach to formulate operational definitions of adherence. Methods: A group of adherence and research methodology experts used theoretical, methodological and practical considerations to examine the process of applying adherence definitions to various research settings, questions and data sources. Consensus was reached through iterative reviewing of discussion summaries and framework versions. Results: We introduce TEOS, a four-component framework to guide the operationalization of adherence concepts: 1) describe treatment as four simultaneous interdependent timelines (recommended and actual use, conditional on prescribing and dispensing); 2) locate four key events along these timelines to delimit the three ABC phases (first and last recommended use, first and last actual use); 3) revisit study objectives and design to finetune research questions and assess measurement validity and reliability needs, and 4) select data sources (e.g., electronic monitoring, self-report, electronic healthcare databases) that best address measurement needs.Conclusion: Using the TEOS framework when designing research and reporting explicitly on these components can improve measurement quality.
KW - electronic healthcare data
KW - electronic monitoring
KW - measurement
KW - medication adherence
KW - persistence
KW - Self-report
U2 - 10.1111/bcp.14659
DO - 10.1111/bcp.14659
M3 - Article
VL - 87
SP - 2521
EP - 2533
JO - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
JF - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
SN - 0306-5251
IS - 6
ER -