The Differential Returns Offered by Mutually Owned and Proprietary UK Depository Institutions: 1993-2000

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

The Differential Returns Offered by Mutually Owned and Proprietary UK Depository Institutions: 1993-2000. / Ashton, John; Letza, Steve.
Yn: Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Cyfrol 74, Rhif 2, 18.06.2003, t. 183-204.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Ashton, J & Letza, S 2003, 'The Differential Returns Offered by Mutually Owned and Proprietary UK Depository Institutions: 1993-2000', Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, cyfrol. 74, rhif 2, tt. 183-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8292.00221

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Ashton J, Letza S. The Differential Returns Offered by Mutually Owned and Proprietary UK Depository Institutions: 1993-2000. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2003 Meh 18;74(2):183-204. doi: 10.1111/1467-8292.00221

Author

Ashton, John ; Letza, Steve. / The Differential Returns Offered by Mutually Owned and Proprietary UK Depository Institutions: 1993-2000. Yn: Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2003 ; Cyfrol 74, Rhif 2. tt. 183-204.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Differential Returns Offered by Mutually Owned and Proprietary UK Depository Institutions: 1993-2000

AU - Ashton, John

AU - Letza, Steve

PY - 2003/6/18

Y1 - 2003/6/18

N2 - The study quantifies the differences in the level of return from investing in deposit (savings) accounts provided by depository institutions, which are either ‘mutual’ or ‘proprietary’. It is shown that for most types of deposit accounts offered in the UK, mutual building societies provide higher returns than proprietary firms. Surprisingly, it is also shown that returns from deposit accounts issued by converted or non-mutual building societies are, generally, lower than either mutual building societies or proprietary firms. These findings are consistent for interest rate data adjusted for the effect of non-price product characteristics and for unadjusted interest rate data.

AB - The study quantifies the differences in the level of return from investing in deposit (savings) accounts provided by depository institutions, which are either ‘mutual’ or ‘proprietary’. It is shown that for most types of deposit accounts offered in the UK, mutual building societies provide higher returns than proprietary firms. Surprisingly, it is also shown that returns from deposit accounts issued by converted or non-mutual building societies are, generally, lower than either mutual building societies or proprietary firms. These findings are consistent for interest rate data adjusted for the effect of non-price product characteristics and for unadjusted interest rate data.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8292.00221

DO - 10.1111/1467-8292.00221

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 183

EP - 204

JO - Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics

JF - Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics

SN - 1370-4788

IS - 2

ER -