StandardStandard

The doctrine of targeting in the context of international trade mark disputes. / Hyland, Mark; Howard, Michael.
Yn: European Intellectual Property Review, Cyfrol 41, Rhif 7, 01.07.2019, t. 464-467.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygl

HarvardHarvard

Hyland, M & Howard, M 2019, 'The doctrine of targeting in the context of international trade mark disputes', European Intellectual Property Review, cyfrol. 41, rhif 7, tt. 464-467.

APA

Hyland, M., & Howard, M. (2019). The doctrine of targeting in the context of international trade mark disputes. European Intellectual Property Review, 41(7), 464-467.

CBE

Hyland M, Howard M. 2019. The doctrine of targeting in the context of international trade mark disputes. European Intellectual Property Review. 41(7):464-467.

MLA

Hyland, Mark a Michael Howard. "The doctrine of targeting in the context of international trade mark disputes". European Intellectual Property Review. 2019, 41(7). 464-467.

VancouverVancouver

Hyland M, Howard M. The doctrine of targeting in the context of international trade mark disputes. European Intellectual Property Review. 2019 Gor 1;41(7):464-467.

Author

Hyland, Mark ; Howard, Michael. / The doctrine of targeting in the context of international trade mark disputes. Yn: European Intellectual Property Review. 2019 ; Cyfrol 41, Rhif 7. tt. 464-467.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The doctrine of targeting in the context of international trade mark disputes

AU - Hyland, Mark

AU - Howard, Michael

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Comments on Easygroup Ltd v Easy Fly Express Ltd (Ch D) on whether permission for service out of the jurisdiction should be granted in relation to a trade mark infringement and passing off claim against a Bangladeshi company advertising its services on a website. Considers the approach to determining whether the defendant targeted UK or EU customers and the implications for UK and EU trade mark owners wishing to protect international goodwill.

AB - Comments on Easygroup Ltd v Easy Fly Express Ltd (Ch D) on whether permission for service out of the jurisdiction should be granted in relation to a trade mark infringement and passing off claim against a Bangladeshi company advertising its services on a website. Considers the approach to determining whether the defendant targeted UK or EU customers and the implications for UK and EU trade mark owners wishing to protect international goodwill.

KW - Air carriers; Allocation of jurisdiction; EU law; Passing off; Service out of jurisdiction; Trade marks

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 464

EP - 467

JO - European Intellectual Property Review

JF - European Intellectual Property Review

SN - 0142-0461

IS - 7

ER -