The Loughborough ‘Mansfield Hosiery’ Strike, 1972: Deindustrialisation, Post-war Migration, and Press Interpretation

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

The Loughborough ‘Mansfield Hosiery’ Strike, 1972: Deindustrialisation, Post-war Migration, and Press Interpretation . / Collinson, Marc.
Yn: Midland HIstory, Cyfrol 47, Rhif 1, 04.2022, t. 77-95.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Collinson M. The Loughborough ‘Mansfield Hosiery’ Strike, 1972: Deindustrialisation, Post-war Migration, and Press Interpretation . Midland HIstory. 2022 Ebr;47(1):77-95. Epub 2022 Ion 6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0047729X.2021.2024658

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Loughborough ‘Mansfield Hosiery’ Strike, 1972

T2 - Deindustrialisation, Post-war Migration, and Press Interpretation

AU - Collinson, Marc

PY - 2022/4

Y1 - 2022/4

N2 - Recent historiographical trends have ensured the continued relevance of the strike at the Mansfield Mills’ hosiery factory in Loughborough in 1972. How this dispute, one of three in the East Midlands in two years dubbed ‘race strikes’ by the press, gained notoriety and were interpreted as an exemplar of British working-class racism requires re-evaluation. The article uses sources underutilised in previous studies, including the archive of the National Union of Hosiery and Knitwear Workers (NUHKW), to better understand the industry, the traditions of the hosiery craft, and how its processes of training and promotion differed from other industries that experienced ‘race strikes’. This article relocates the dispute within the processes of deindustrialisation, demographic and social change, workplace culture, and the importance of press reportage in shaping interpretations.

AB - Recent historiographical trends have ensured the continued relevance of the strike at the Mansfield Mills’ hosiery factory in Loughborough in 1972. How this dispute, one of three in the East Midlands in two years dubbed ‘race strikes’ by the press, gained notoriety and were interpreted as an exemplar of British working-class racism requires re-evaluation. The article uses sources underutilised in previous studies, including the archive of the National Union of Hosiery and Knitwear Workers (NUHKW), to better understand the industry, the traditions of the hosiery craft, and how its processes of training and promotion differed from other industries that experienced ‘race strikes’. This article relocates the dispute within the processes of deindustrialisation, demographic and social change, workplace culture, and the importance of press reportage in shaping interpretations.

KW - Loughborough

KW - deindustrialization

KW - hosiery

KW - locality

KW - migration

KW - trade unionism

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/0047729X.2021.2024658

DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/0047729X.2021.2024658

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 77

EP - 95

JO - Midland HIstory

JF - Midland HIstory

SN - 1756-381X

IS - 1

ER -