StandardStandard

The specification, acceptability and effectiveness of respite care and short breaks for young adults with complex healthcare needs: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review. / Pilkington, Gerlinde; Knighting, Katherine; Bray, Lucy et al.
Yn: BMJ Open, Cyfrol 9, Rhif 6, e030470, 17.06.2019.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Pilkington, G, Knighting, K, Bray, L, Downing, J, Jack, BA, Maden, M, Mateus, C, Noyes, J, O'Brien, MR, Roe, B, Tsang, A & Spencer, S 2019, 'The specification, acceptability and effectiveness of respite care and short breaks for young adults with complex healthcare needs: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review', BMJ Open, cyfrol. 9, rhif 6, e030470. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030470

APA

Pilkington, G., Knighting, K., Bray, L., Downing, J., Jack, B. A., Maden, M., Mateus, C., Noyes, J., O'Brien, M. R., Roe, B., Tsang, A., & Spencer, S. (2019). The specification, acceptability and effectiveness of respite care and short breaks for young adults with complex healthcare needs: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Open, 9(6), Erthygl e030470. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030470

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Pilkington G, Knighting K, Bray L, Downing J, Jack BA, Maden M et al. The specification, acceptability and effectiveness of respite care and short breaks for young adults with complex healthcare needs: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019 Meh 17;9(6):e030470. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030470

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The specification, acceptability and effectiveness of respite care and short breaks for young adults with complex healthcare needs

T2 - protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review

AU - Pilkington, Gerlinde

AU - Knighting, Katherine

AU - Bray, Lucy

AU - Downing, Julia

AU - Jack, Barbara A

AU - Maden, Michelle

AU - Mateus, Ceu

AU - Noyes, Jane

AU - O'Brien, Mary R

AU - Roe, Brenda

AU - Tsang, Anthony

AU - Spencer, Sally

PY - 2019/6/17

Y1 - 2019/6/17

N2 - INTRODUCTION: The number of young adults with complex healthcare needs due to life-limiting conditions/complex physical disability has risen significantly as children with complex conditions survive into adulthood. Respite care and short breaks are an essential service, however, needs often go unmet after the transition to adult services, leading to a significant impact on the life expectancy and quality of life for this population. We aim to identify, appraise and synthesise relevant evidence to explore respite care and short breaks provision for this population, and to develop a conceptual framework for understanding service models.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods systematic review conducted in two stages: (1) knowledge map and (2) evidence review. We will comprehensively search multiple electronic databases; use the Citations, Lead authors, Unpublished materials, Google Scholar, Theories, Early examples, and Related projects (CLUSTER) approach, search relevant websites and circulate a 'call for evidence'. Using the setting, perspective, intervention/phenomenon of interest, comparison and evaluation framework, two reviewers will independently select evidence for inclusion into a knowledge map and subsequent evidence review, extract data relating to study and population characteristics, methods and outcomes; and assess the quality of evidence. A third reviewer will arbitrate where necessary.Evidence will be synthesised using the following approaches: quantitative (narratively/conducting meta-analyses where appropriate); qualitative (framework approach); policy and guidelines (documentary analysis informed approach). An overall, integrated synthesis will be created using a modified framework approach. We will use Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)/GRADE-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research to assess the strength and confidence of the synthesised evidence. Throughout, we will develop a conceptual framework to articulate how service models work in relation to context and setting.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as this is a systematic review. We will present our work in academic journals, at appropriate conferences; we will disseminate findings across networks using a range of media. Steering and advisory groups were established to ensure findings are shared widely and in accessible formats.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018088780.

AB - INTRODUCTION: The number of young adults with complex healthcare needs due to life-limiting conditions/complex physical disability has risen significantly as children with complex conditions survive into adulthood. Respite care and short breaks are an essential service, however, needs often go unmet after the transition to adult services, leading to a significant impact on the life expectancy and quality of life for this population. We aim to identify, appraise and synthesise relevant evidence to explore respite care and short breaks provision for this population, and to develop a conceptual framework for understanding service models.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods systematic review conducted in two stages: (1) knowledge map and (2) evidence review. We will comprehensively search multiple electronic databases; use the Citations, Lead authors, Unpublished materials, Google Scholar, Theories, Early examples, and Related projects (CLUSTER) approach, search relevant websites and circulate a 'call for evidence'. Using the setting, perspective, intervention/phenomenon of interest, comparison and evaluation framework, two reviewers will independently select evidence for inclusion into a knowledge map and subsequent evidence review, extract data relating to study and population characteristics, methods and outcomes; and assess the quality of evidence. A third reviewer will arbitrate where necessary.Evidence will be synthesised using the following approaches: quantitative (narratively/conducting meta-analyses where appropriate); qualitative (framework approach); policy and guidelines (documentary analysis informed approach). An overall, integrated synthesis will be created using a modified framework approach. We will use Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)/GRADE-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research to assess the strength and confidence of the synthesised evidence. Throughout, we will develop a conceptual framework to articulate how service models work in relation to context and setting.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as this is a systematic review. We will present our work in academic journals, at appropriate conferences; we will disseminate findings across networks using a range of media. Steering and advisory groups were established to ensure findings are shared widely and in accessible formats.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018088780.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030470

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030470

M3 - Article

C2 - 31213455

VL - 9

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 6

M1 - e030470

ER -