TY - JOUR

T1 - Thermoregulatory responses to exercise at a fixed rate of heat production are not altered by acute hypoxia

AU - Coombs, Geoff B

AU - Cramer, Matthew N

AU - Ravanelli, Nicholas

AU - Imbeault, Pascal

AU - Jay, Ollie

N1 - Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - This study sought to assess the within-subject influence of acute hypoxia on exercise-induced changes in core temperature and sweating. Eight participants [1.75 (0.06) m, 70.2 (6.8) kg, 25 (4) yr, 54 (8) ml·kg-1·min-1] completed 45 min of cycling, once in normoxia (NORM; [Formula: see text] = 0.21) and twice in hypoxia (HYP1/HYP2; [Formula: see text]= 0.13) at 34.4(0.2)°C, 46(3)% RH. These trials were designed to elicit 1) two distinctly different %V̇o2peak [NORM: 45 (8)% and HYP1: 62 (7)%] at the same heat production (Hprod) [NORM: 6.7 (0.6) W/kg and HYP1: 7.0 (0.5) W/kg]; and 2) the same %V̇o2peak [NORM: 45 (8)% and HYP2: 48 (5)%] with different Hprod [NORM: 6.7 (0.6) W/kg and HYP2: 5.5 (0.6) W/kg]. At a fixed %V̇o2peak, changes in rectal temperature (ΔTre) and changes in esophageal temperature (ΔTes) were greater at end-exercise in NORM [ΔTre: 0.76 (0.19)°C; ΔTes: 0.64 (0.22)°C] compared with HYP2 [ΔTre: 0.56 (0.22)°C, P < 0.01; ΔTes: 0.42 (0.21)°C, P < 0.01]. As a result of a greater Hprod (P < 0.01) in normoxia, and therefore evaporative heat balance requirements, to maintain a similar %V̇o2peak compared with hypoxia, mean local sweat rates (LSR) from the forearm, upper back, and forehead were greater (all P < 0.01) in NORM [1.10 (0.20) mg·cm-2·min-1] compared with HYP2 [0.71 (0.19) mg·cm-2·min-1]. However, at a fixed Hprod, ΔTre [0.75 (0.24)°C; P = 0.77] and ΔTes [0.63 (0.29)°C; P = 0.69] were not different in HYP1, compared with NORM. Likewise, mean LSR [1.11 (0.20) mg·cm-2·min-1] was not different (P = 0.84) in HYP1 compared with NORM. These data demonstrate, using a within-subjects design, that hypoxia does not independently influence thermoregulatory responses. Additionally, further evidence is provided to support that metabolic heat production, irrespective of %V̇o2peak, determines changes in core temperature and sweating during exercise.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Using a within-subject design, hypoxia does not independently alter core temperature and sweating during exercise at a fixed rate of heat production. These findings also further contribute to the development of a methodological framework for assessing differences in thermoregulatory responses to exercise between various populations and individuals. Using the combined environmental stressors of heat and hypoxia we conclusively demonstrate that exercise intensity relative to aerobic capacity (i.e., %V̇o2max) does not influence changes in thermoregulatory responses.

AB - This study sought to assess the within-subject influence of acute hypoxia on exercise-induced changes in core temperature and sweating. Eight participants [1.75 (0.06) m, 70.2 (6.8) kg, 25 (4) yr, 54 (8) ml·kg-1·min-1] completed 45 min of cycling, once in normoxia (NORM; [Formula: see text] = 0.21) and twice in hypoxia (HYP1/HYP2; [Formula: see text]= 0.13) at 34.4(0.2)°C, 46(3)% RH. These trials were designed to elicit 1) two distinctly different %V̇o2peak [NORM: 45 (8)% and HYP1: 62 (7)%] at the same heat production (Hprod) [NORM: 6.7 (0.6) W/kg and HYP1: 7.0 (0.5) W/kg]; and 2) the same %V̇o2peak [NORM: 45 (8)% and HYP2: 48 (5)%] with different Hprod [NORM: 6.7 (0.6) W/kg and HYP2: 5.5 (0.6) W/kg]. At a fixed %V̇o2peak, changes in rectal temperature (ΔTre) and changes in esophageal temperature (ΔTes) were greater at end-exercise in NORM [ΔTre: 0.76 (0.19)°C; ΔTes: 0.64 (0.22)°C] compared with HYP2 [ΔTre: 0.56 (0.22)°C, P < 0.01; ΔTes: 0.42 (0.21)°C, P < 0.01]. As a result of a greater Hprod (P < 0.01) in normoxia, and therefore evaporative heat balance requirements, to maintain a similar %V̇o2peak compared with hypoxia, mean local sweat rates (LSR) from the forearm, upper back, and forehead were greater (all P < 0.01) in NORM [1.10 (0.20) mg·cm-2·min-1] compared with HYP2 [0.71 (0.19) mg·cm-2·min-1]. However, at a fixed Hprod, ΔTre [0.75 (0.24)°C; P = 0.77] and ΔTes [0.63 (0.29)°C; P = 0.69] were not different in HYP1, compared with NORM. Likewise, mean LSR [1.11 (0.20) mg·cm-2·min-1] was not different (P = 0.84) in HYP1 compared with NORM. These data demonstrate, using a within-subjects design, that hypoxia does not independently influence thermoregulatory responses. Additionally, further evidence is provided to support that metabolic heat production, irrespective of %V̇o2peak, determines changes in core temperature and sweating during exercise.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Using a within-subject design, hypoxia does not independently alter core temperature and sweating during exercise at a fixed rate of heat production. These findings also further contribute to the development of a methodological framework for assessing differences in thermoregulatory responses to exercise between various populations and individuals. Using the combined environmental stressors of heat and hypoxia we conclusively demonstrate that exercise intensity relative to aerobic capacity (i.e., %V̇o2max) does not influence changes in thermoregulatory responses.

KW - Body Temperature/physiology

KW - Body Temperature Regulation/physiology

KW - Exercise/physiology

KW - Female

KW - Hot Temperature

KW - Humans

KW - Hypoxia/physiopathology

KW - Male

KW - Sweating/physiology

KW - Thermogenesis/physiology

U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00829.2016

DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00829.2016

M3 - Article

C2 - 28302708

VL - 122

SP - 1198

EP - 1207

JO - Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)

JF - Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)

SN - 8750-7587

IS - 5

ER -