Training needs for staff providing remote services in general practice: a mixed-methods study

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

Fersiynau electronig

Dogfennau

Dangosydd eitem ddigidol (DOI)

  • Trisha Greenhalgh
    University of Oxford
  • Rebecca Payne
    University of Oxford
  • Nina Hemmings
    Nuffield Trust
  • Helen Leach
    University of Warwick
  • Isabel Hanson
    University of Oxford
  • Anwar Khan
    Ching Way Medical Centre, London
  • Lisa Miller
    Health Education London
  • Emma Ladds
    University of Oxford
  • Aileen Clarke
    University of Oxford
  • Sara E Shaw
    University of Oxford
  • Francesca Dakin
    University of Oxford
  • Sietse Wieringa
    University of Oslo
  • Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt
    University of Plymouth
  • Stuart D Faulkner
    University of Oxford
  • Richard Byng
    Plymouth University
  • Asli Kalin
    University of Oxford
  • Lucy Moore
    University of Oxford
  • Joseph Wherton
    University of Oxford
  • Laiba Husain
    University of Oxford
  • Rebecca Rosen
    University of Oxford

BACKGROUND: Contemporary general practice includes many kinds of remote encounter. The rise in telephone, video and online modalities for triage and clinical care requires clinicians and support staff to be trained, both individually and as teams, but evidence-based competencies have not previously been produced for general practice.

AIM: To identify training needs, core competencies, and learning methods for staff providing remote encounters.

DESIGN AND SETTING: Mixed-methods study in UK general practice.

METHOD: Data were collated from longitudinal ethnographic case studies of 12 general practices; a multi-stakeholder workshop; interviews with policymakers, training providers, and trainees; published research; and grey literature (such as training materials and surveys). Data were coded thematically and analysed using theories of individual and team learning.

RESULTS: Learning to provide remote services occurred in the context of high workload, understaffing, and complex workflows. Low confidence and perceived unmet training needs were common. Training priorities for novice clinicians included basic technological skills, triage, ethics (for privacy and consent), and communication and clinical skills. Established clinicians' training priorities include advanced communication skills (for example, maintaining rapport and attentiveness), working within the limits of technologies, making complex judgements, coordinating multi-professional care in a distributed environment, and training others. Much existing training is didactic and technology focused. While basic knowledge was often gained using such methods, the ability and confidence to make complex judgements were usually acquired through experience, informal discussions, and on-the-job methods such as shadowing. Whole-team training was valued but rarely available. A draft set of competencies is offered based on the findings.

CONCLUSION: The knowledge needed to deliver high-quality remote encounters to diverse patient groups is complex, collective, and organisationally embedded. The vital role of non-didactic training, for example, joint clinical sessions, case-based discussions, and in-person, whole-team, on-the-job training, needs to be recognised.

Allweddeiriau

Iaith wreiddiolSaesneg
Tudalennau (o-i)e17–e26
CyfnodolynBritish Journal of General Practice
Cyfrol74
Rhif y cyfnodolyn738
Dyddiad ar-lein cynnar28 Rhag 2023
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)
StatwsCyhoeddwyd - Ion 2024
Cyhoeddwyd yn allanolIe
Gweld graff cysylltiadau