Using Routinely Recorded Data in the UK to Assess Outcomes in a Randomised Controlled Trial: The Trials of Access

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

Fersiynau electronig

Dogfennau

Dangosydd eitem ddigidol (DOI)

  • Graham Powell
    Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool
  • Laura Bonnett
    Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool
  • Catrin T. Smith
    Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool
  • Dyfrig Hughes
  • Paula Williamson
    Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool
  • Anthony Marson
    Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool
Background
In the UK, routinely recorded data may benefit prospective studies including randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In an on-going study, we aim to assess the feasibility of access and agreement of routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data compared to data collected during a RCT using standard prospective methods. This paper will summarise available UK routinely recorded data sources and discuss our experience with the feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data for participants of a RCT before finally proposing recommendations for improving the access and implementation of routinely recorded data in RCTs.
Methods
Setting: the case study RCT is the Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs II (SANAD II) trial, a pragmatic, UK, multicentre, phase IV RCT assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of antiepileptic drug treatments for newly diagnosed epilepsy.
Participants: 98 participants have provided written consent to permit the request of routinely recorded data.
Study procedures: routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data were identified and data requested through formal applications from available data holders for the duration that participants have been recruited into SANAD II. The feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data during a RCT is assessed and recommendations for improving access proposed.
Results
Secondary-care clinical and socioeconomic data is recorded on a national basis and can be accessed, although there are limitations in the application process. Primary-care data are recorded by a number of organisations on a de-identified basis but access for specific individuals has not been feasible. Access to data recorded by non-clinical sources, including The Department for Work and Pensions and The Driving and Vehicle Licensing Agency, was not successful.
Conclusions
Recommendations discussed include further research to assess the attributes of routinely recorded data, an assessment of public perceptions and the development of strategies to collaboratively improve access to routinely recorded data for research.
Iaith wreiddiolSaesneg
Rhif yr erthygl389
Nifer y tudalennau11
CyfnodolynTrials
Cyfrol18
Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs)
StatwsCyhoeddwyd - 23 Awst 2017

Cyfanswm lawlrlwytho

Nid oes data ar gael
Gweld graff cysylltiadau