Validation of the Fitbit Zip® as a Measure of Pre-school Children’s Step Count: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
StandardStandard
Yn: BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, Cyfrol 2017, Rhif 3, e000272, 11.10.2017.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of the Fitbit Zip® as a Measure of Pre-school Children’s Step Count: A Cross-Sectional Study.
AU - Sharp, Catherine
AU - Mackintosh, Kelly
AU - Erjavec, Mihela
AU - Pascoe, Duncan
AU - Horne, Pauline
N1 - The School of Psychology, Bangor University, supported the study financially.
PY - 2017/10/11
Y1 - 2017/10/11
N2 - Objectives: Validation of physical activity measurement tools is essential to determine the relationship between physical activity and health in pre-school children, but research to date has not focussed on this priority. The aims of this study were to ascertain inter-rater reliability of observer step count, and inter-device reliability and validity of Fitbit Zip accelerometer step counts in pre-school children. Methods: Fifty-six 3-4-year-old children (29 girls) recruited from 10 nurseries in North Wales, UK, wore two Fitbit Zip accelerometers whilst performing a timed walking task in their childcare settings. Accelerometers were worn in secure pockets inside a custom-made tabard. Video-recordings enabled two observers to independently code the number of steps performed in 3 minutes by each child during the walking task. Intra-class correlations, concordance correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots and absolute percent error were calculated to assess the reliability and validity of the consumer-grade device. Results: An excellent intra-class correlation was found between the two observer codings (ICC = 1.00) and the two Fitbit Zips (ICC = 0.91). Concordance between the Fitbit Zips and observer counts was also high (r = 0.77), with an acceptable absolute percent error (6–7%). Bland-Altman analyses identified a bias for Fitbit 1 of 22.8 ± 19.1 steps with limits of agreement between -14.7 and 60.2 steps, and a bias for Fitbit 2 of 25.2 ± 23.2 steps with limits of agreement between -20.2 and 70.5 steps.Conclusions: Fitbit Zip accelerometers are a reliable and valid method of recording pre-school children’s step count in a childcare setting.
AB - Objectives: Validation of physical activity measurement tools is essential to determine the relationship between physical activity and health in pre-school children, but research to date has not focussed on this priority. The aims of this study were to ascertain inter-rater reliability of observer step count, and inter-device reliability and validity of Fitbit Zip accelerometer step counts in pre-school children. Methods: Fifty-six 3-4-year-old children (29 girls) recruited from 10 nurseries in North Wales, UK, wore two Fitbit Zip accelerometers whilst performing a timed walking task in their childcare settings. Accelerometers were worn in secure pockets inside a custom-made tabard. Video-recordings enabled two observers to independently code the number of steps performed in 3 minutes by each child during the walking task. Intra-class correlations, concordance correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots and absolute percent error were calculated to assess the reliability and validity of the consumer-grade device. Results: An excellent intra-class correlation was found between the two observer codings (ICC = 1.00) and the two Fitbit Zips (ICC = 0.91). Concordance between the Fitbit Zips and observer counts was also high (r = 0.77), with an acceptable absolute percent error (6–7%). Bland-Altman analyses identified a bias for Fitbit 1 of 22.8 ± 19.1 steps with limits of agreement between -14.7 and 60.2 steps, and a bias for Fitbit 2 of 25.2 ± 23.2 steps with limits of agreement between -20.2 and 70.5 steps.Conclusions: Fitbit Zip accelerometers are a reliable and valid method of recording pre-school children’s step count in a childcare setting.
KW - Children
KW - Accelerometer
KW - Physical activity
KW - Validation
KW - Step count
U2 - 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000272
DO - 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000272
M3 - Article
VL - 2017
JO - BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
JF - BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
SN - 2055-7647
IS - 3
M1 - e000272
T2 - Experimental Analysis of Behaviour Group International Conference (EABG), University College, London
Y2 - 10 April 2017 through 12 April 2017
ER -