Validation of the Fitbit Zip® as a Measure of Pre-school Children’s Step Count: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Validation of the Fitbit Zip® as a Measure of Pre-school Children’s Step Count: A Cross-Sectional Study. / Sharp, Catherine; Mackintosh, Kelly ; Erjavec, Mihela et al.
Yn: BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, Cyfrol 2017, Rhif 3, e000272, 11.10.2017.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Sharp C, Mackintosh K, Erjavec M, Pascoe D, Horne P. Validation of the Fitbit Zip® as a Measure of Pre-school Children’s Step Count: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. 2017 Hyd 11;2017(3):e000272. Epub 2017 Hyd 11. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000272, 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000272

Author

Sharp, Catherine ; Mackintosh, Kelly ; Erjavec, Mihela et al. / Validation of the Fitbit Zip® as a Measure of Pre-school Children’s Step Count: A Cross-Sectional Study. Yn: BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. 2017 ; Cyfrol 2017, Rhif 3.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of the Fitbit Zip® as a Measure of Pre-school Children’s Step Count: A Cross-Sectional Study.

AU - Sharp, Catherine

AU - Mackintosh, Kelly

AU - Erjavec, Mihela

AU - Pascoe, Duncan

AU - Horne, Pauline

N1 - The School of Psychology, Bangor University, supported the study financially.

PY - 2017/10/11

Y1 - 2017/10/11

N2 - Objectives: Validation of physical activity measurement tools is essential to determine the relationship between physical activity and health in pre-school children, but research to date has not focussed on this priority. The aims of this study were to ascertain inter-rater reliability of observer step count, and inter-device reliability and validity of Fitbit Zip accelerometer step counts in pre-school children. Methods: Fifty-six 3-4-year-old children (29 girls) recruited from 10 nurseries in North Wales, UK, wore two Fitbit Zip accelerometers whilst performing a timed walking task in their childcare settings. Accelerometers were worn in secure pockets inside a custom-made tabard. Video-recordings enabled two observers to independently code the number of steps performed in 3 minutes by each child during the walking task. Intra-class correlations, concordance correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots and absolute percent error were calculated to assess the reliability and validity of the consumer-grade device. Results: An excellent intra-class correlation was found between the two observer codings (ICC = 1.00) and the two Fitbit Zips (ICC = 0.91). Concordance between the Fitbit Zips and observer counts was also high (r = 0.77), with an acceptable absolute percent error (6–7%). Bland-Altman analyses identified a bias for Fitbit 1 of 22.8 ± 19.1 steps with limits of agreement between -14.7 and 60.2 steps, and a bias for Fitbit 2 of 25.2 ± 23.2 steps with limits of agreement between -20.2 and 70.5 steps.Conclusions: Fitbit Zip accelerometers are a reliable and valid method of recording pre-school children’s step count in a childcare setting.

AB - Objectives: Validation of physical activity measurement tools is essential to determine the relationship between physical activity and health in pre-school children, but research to date has not focussed on this priority. The aims of this study were to ascertain inter-rater reliability of observer step count, and inter-device reliability and validity of Fitbit Zip accelerometer step counts in pre-school children. Methods: Fifty-six 3-4-year-old children (29 girls) recruited from 10 nurseries in North Wales, UK, wore two Fitbit Zip accelerometers whilst performing a timed walking task in their childcare settings. Accelerometers were worn in secure pockets inside a custom-made tabard. Video-recordings enabled two observers to independently code the number of steps performed in 3 minutes by each child during the walking task. Intra-class correlations, concordance correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots and absolute percent error were calculated to assess the reliability and validity of the consumer-grade device. Results: An excellent intra-class correlation was found between the two observer codings (ICC = 1.00) and the two Fitbit Zips (ICC = 0.91). Concordance between the Fitbit Zips and observer counts was also high (r = 0.77), with an acceptable absolute percent error (6–7%). Bland-Altman analyses identified a bias for Fitbit 1 of 22.8 ± 19.1 steps with limits of agreement between -14.7 and 60.2 steps, and a bias for Fitbit 2 of 25.2 ± 23.2 steps with limits of agreement between -20.2 and 70.5 steps.Conclusions: Fitbit Zip accelerometers are a reliable and valid method of recording pre-school children’s step count in a childcare setting.

KW - Children

KW - Accelerometer

KW - Physical activity

KW - Validation

KW - Step count

U2 - 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000272

DO - 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000272

M3 - Article

VL - 2017

JO - BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine

JF - BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine

SN - 2055-7647

IS - 3

M1 - e000272

T2 - Experimental Analysis of Behaviour Group International Conference (EABG), University College, London

Y2 - 10 April 2017 through 12 April 2017

ER -