Voluntary biodiversity offset strategies in Madagascar

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

StandardStandard

Voluntary biodiversity offset strategies in Madagascar. / Bidaud, C.; Hrabanski, M.; Meral, P.
Yn: Ecosystems, Cyfrol 15, 19.03.2015, t. 181-189.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

Bidaud, C, Hrabanski, M & Meral, P 2015, 'Voluntary biodiversity offset strategies in Madagascar', Ecosystems, cyfrol. 15, tt. 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.011

APA

Bidaud, C., Hrabanski, M., & Meral, P. (2015). Voluntary biodiversity offset strategies in Madagascar. Ecosystems, 15, 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.011

CBE

MLA

Bidaud, C., M. Hrabanski a P. Meral. "Voluntary biodiversity offset strategies in Madagascar". Ecosystems. 2015, 15. 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.011

VancouverVancouver

Bidaud C, Hrabanski M, Meral P. Voluntary biodiversity offset strategies in Madagascar. Ecosystems. 2015 Maw 19;15:181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.011

Author

Bidaud, C. ; Hrabanski, M. ; Meral, P. / Voluntary biodiversity offset strategies in Madagascar. Yn: Ecosystems. 2015 ; Cyfrol 15. tt. 181-189.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voluntary biodiversity offset strategies in Madagascar

AU - Bidaud, C.

AU - Hrabanski, M.

AU - Meral, P.

PY - 2015/3/19

Y1 - 2015/3/19

N2 - In this article we examine the institutional strategies and methods of biodiversity offset calculation employed by two mining companies in Madagascar. Much like the REDD+ mechanisms, these environmental projects are based on estimations of the past and predictions of the future, and require validation by international experts. They incorporate a set of standard indicators adapted to the affected habitats, and specially developed units of measurement to demonstrate ecological equivalence. The complex and diverse mitigation portfolios of these companies include aspects of both in-kind and financial compensation, and allow the combination of different types of programs that may be developed directly by the company or delegated to conservation non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

AB - In this article we examine the institutional strategies and methods of biodiversity offset calculation employed by two mining companies in Madagascar. Much like the REDD+ mechanisms, these environmental projects are based on estimations of the past and predictions of the future, and require validation by international experts. They incorporate a set of standard indicators adapted to the affected habitats, and specially developed units of measurement to demonstrate ecological equivalence. The complex and diverse mitigation portfolios of these companies include aspects of both in-kind and financial compensation, and allow the combination of different types of programs that may be developed directly by the company or delegated to conservation non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.011

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.011

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 181

EP - 189

JO - Ecosystems

JF - Ecosystems

SN - 1435-0629

ER -