What Methods of Scoring Young Children’s Spelling Best Predict Later Spelling Performance?
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
StandardStandard
Yn: Journal of Research in Reading, Cyfrol 42, Rhif 1, 02.2019, t. 80-96.
Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - What Methods of Scoring Young Children’s Spelling Best Predict Later Spelling Performance?
AU - Treiman, Rebecca
AU - Kessler, Brett
AU - Caravolas, Marketa
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - BackgroundChildren’s spellings are often scored as correct or incorrect, but other measures may be better predictors of later spelling performance. Method We examined seven measures of spelling in Reception Year and Year 1 (5–6 years old) as predictors of performance on a standardized spelling test in Year 2 (age 7). Results Correctness was the best predictor of later spelling by the middle of Year 1, and it significantly outperformed a binary measure of phonological plausibility at the end of Reception Year. Nonbinary measures based on Levenshtein distance were significant predictors of later spelling in the middle of Reception Year and in children who produced no correct spellings. Some widely used scales performed less well with children who did not yet produce any correct spellings. ConclusionsNonbinary measures of spelling performance can predict later spelling performance, but for a more restricted period than anticipated based on many theories.
AB - BackgroundChildren’s spellings are often scored as correct or incorrect, but other measures may be better predictors of later spelling performance. Method We examined seven measures of spelling in Reception Year and Year 1 (5–6 years old) as predictors of performance on a standardized spelling test in Year 2 (age 7). Results Correctness was the best predictor of later spelling by the middle of Year 1, and it significantly outperformed a binary measure of phonological plausibility at the end of Reception Year. Nonbinary measures based on Levenshtein distance were significant predictors of later spelling in the middle of Reception Year and in children who produced no correct spellings. Some widely used scales performed less well with children who did not yet produce any correct spellings. ConclusionsNonbinary measures of spelling performance can predict later spelling performance, but for a more restricted period than anticipated based on many theories.
KW - Spelling
KW - Phonology
KW - Ortography
KW - Spelling errors
KW - Levenshtein
U2 - 10.1111/1467-9817.12241
DO - 10.1111/1467-9817.12241
M3 - Article
VL - 42
SP - 80
EP - 96
JO - Journal of Research in Reading
JF - Journal of Research in Reading
SN - 0141-0423
IS - 1
ER -