StandardStandard

When some triggers a scalar inference out of the blue: An electrophysiological study of a Stroop-like conflict elicited by single words. / Barbet, Cécile; Thierry, Guillaume.
Yn: Cognition, Cyfrol 177, Rhif August, 08.2018, t. 58-68.

Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolynErthygladolygiad gan gymheiriaid

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Barbet C, Thierry G. When some triggers a scalar inference out of the blue: An electrophysiological study of a Stroop-like conflict elicited by single words. Cognition. 2018 Awst;177(August):58-68. Epub 2018 Ebr 10. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.013

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - When some triggers a scalar inference out of the blue

T2 - An electrophysiological study of a Stroop-like conflict elicited by single words

AU - Barbet, Cécile

AU - Thierry, Guillaume

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - Some studies in experimental pragmatics have concluded that scalar inferences (e.g., ‘some X are Y’ implicates ‘not all X are Y’) are context-dependent prag- matic computations delayed relative to semantic computations. However, it remains unclear whether strong contextual support is necessary to trigger such inferences. Here we tested if the scalar inference ‘not all’ triggered by some can be evoked in a maximally neutral context. We investigated event-related potential (ERP) amplitude modulations elicited by Stroop-like conflicts in par- ticipants instructed to indicate whether strings of letters were printed with all their letters in upper case or otherwise. In a randomized stream of non-words and distractor words, the words all, some and case were either presented in capitals or they featured at least one lower case letter. As expected, we found a significant conflict-related N450 modulation when comparing e.g., ‘aLl’ with ‘ALL’. Surprisingly, despite the fact that most responses from the same par- ticipants in a sentence-picture verification task were literal, we also found a similar modulation when comparing ‘SOME’ with e.g., ‘SoMe’, even though SOME could only elicit such a Stroop conflict when construed pragmatically. No such modulation was found for e.g., ‘CasE’ vs. ‘CASE’ (neutral contrast). These results suggest that some can appear incongruent with the concept of ‘all’ even when contextual support is minimal. Furthermore, there was no signi- ficant correlation between N450 effect magnitude (‘SOME’ minus e.g., ‘sOMe’) and pragmatic response rates recorded in the sentence-picture verification task. Overall, this study shows for the first time that the pragmatic meaning of some can be accessed in a maximally neutral context, and thus, that the scalar infer- ence ‘not all’ triggered by some should be construed as context-sensitive rather than context-dependent, that is, more or less salient and relevant depending on the context rather than entirely contingent upon it.

AB - Some studies in experimental pragmatics have concluded that scalar inferences (e.g., ‘some X are Y’ implicates ‘not all X are Y’) are context-dependent prag- matic computations delayed relative to semantic computations. However, it remains unclear whether strong contextual support is necessary to trigger such inferences. Here we tested if the scalar inference ‘not all’ triggered by some can be evoked in a maximally neutral context. We investigated event-related potential (ERP) amplitude modulations elicited by Stroop-like conflicts in par- ticipants instructed to indicate whether strings of letters were printed with all their letters in upper case or otherwise. In a randomized stream of non-words and distractor words, the words all, some and case were either presented in capitals or they featured at least one lower case letter. As expected, we found a significant conflict-related N450 modulation when comparing e.g., ‘aLl’ with ‘ALL’. Surprisingly, despite the fact that most responses from the same par- ticipants in a sentence-picture verification task were literal, we also found a similar modulation when comparing ‘SOME’ with e.g., ‘SoMe’, even though SOME could only elicit such a Stroop conflict when construed pragmatically. No such modulation was found for e.g., ‘CasE’ vs. ‘CASE’ (neutral contrast). These results suggest that some can appear incongruent with the concept of ‘all’ even when contextual support is minimal. Furthermore, there was no signi- ficant correlation between N450 effect magnitude (‘SOME’ minus e.g., ‘sOMe’) and pragmatic response rates recorded in the sentence-picture verification task. Overall, this study shows for the first time that the pragmatic meaning of some can be accessed in a maximally neutral context, and thus, that the scalar infer- ence ‘not all’ triggered by some should be construed as context-sensitive rather than context-dependent, that is, more or less salient and relevant depending on the context rather than entirely contingent upon it.

KW - Event-related brain potentials

KW - N450 effect

KW - Experimental semantics

KW - Experimental pragmatics

KW - non-literal meaning

KW - context-dependency

KW - Stroop

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.013

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.013

M3 - Article

VL - 177

SP - 58

EP - 68

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - August

ER -