A Comparison of Sighted and Visually Impaired Children's Text Comprehension
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 85, 02.2019, p. 8-19.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A Comparison of Sighted and Visually Impaired Children's Text Comprehension
AU - Papastergiou, Athanasia
AU - Pappas, Vasileios
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Aim: Do children with visual impairments outperform their sighted cohorts in reading and auditory comprehension tasks? Methods: We address this question by applying panel regression techniques on a comprehensive sample of 16 children with visual impairments from a Greek special school for students with visual impairments. Results: By comparing the reader comprehender profile for both children types, we find that the children with visual impairments perform better than their sighted counterparts. The better performance is supported both unconditionally and conditionally on idiosyncratic characteristics, such as age, text complexity, modality, sex and reading ability. Conclusion: Decomposing the reader comprehender profile into a literal, global and local type of questions we find that the results are mainly driven by the superior performance of the children with VI in the literal questions.
AB - Aim: Do children with visual impairments outperform their sighted cohorts in reading and auditory comprehension tasks? Methods: We address this question by applying panel regression techniques on a comprehensive sample of 16 children with visual impairments from a Greek special school for students with visual impairments. Results: By comparing the reader comprehender profile for both children types, we find that the children with visual impairments perform better than their sighted counterparts. The better performance is supported both unconditionally and conditionally on idiosyncratic characteristics, such as age, text complexity, modality, sex and reading ability. Conclusion: Decomposing the reader comprehender profile into a literal, global and local type of questions we find that the results are mainly driven by the superior performance of the children with VI in the literal questions.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.10.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.10.003
M3 - Article
VL - 85
SP - 8
EP - 19
JO - Research in Developmental Disabilities
JF - Research in Developmental Disabilities
SN - 0891-4222
ER -