A longitudinal exploration of mental health resilience, cognitive impairment and loneliness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

A longitudinal exploration of mental health resilience, cognitive impairment and loneliness. / Windle, Gill; Hoare, Zoe; Woods, Bob et al.
In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 36, No. 7, 07.2021, p. 1020-1028.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Windle, G, Hoare, Z, Woods, B, Huisman, M & Burholt, V 2021, 'A longitudinal exploration of mental health resilience, cognitive impairment and loneliness', International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1020-1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5504

APA

Windle, G., Hoare, Z., Woods, B., Huisman, M., & Burholt, V. (2021). A longitudinal exploration of mental health resilience, cognitive impairment and loneliness. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 36(7), 1020-1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5504

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Windle G, Hoare Z, Woods B, Huisman M, Burholt V. A longitudinal exploration of mental health resilience, cognitive impairment and loneliness. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;36(7):1020-1028. Epub 2021 Feb 18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5504

Author

Windle, Gill ; Hoare, Zoe ; Woods, Bob et al. / A longitudinal exploration of mental health resilience, cognitive impairment and loneliness. In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2021 ; Vol. 36, No. 7. pp. 1020-1028.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A longitudinal exploration of mental health resilience, cognitive impairment and loneliness

AU - Windle, Gill

AU - Hoare, Zoe

AU - Woods, Bob

AU - Huisman, Martijn

AU - Burholt, Vanessa

N1 - Economic and Social Research Council

PY - 2021/7

Y1 - 2021/7

N2 - Objective: There is a growing interest in how people living with dementia may achieve good outcomes and be resilient despite their health challenges. Understanding what might be important for resilience in this population is largely untested theory. Methods: The analysis draws a subsample with cognitive impairment (N = 579) from two waves of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies Wales study, a nationally representative study of community‐dwelling people aged 65+ in Wales. We constructed a measure of mental health resilience (MHR) defined as no depression, no anxiety and high well‐being. Drawing on a resilience framework, we tested univariate and cumulative effects models of the factors that enable MHR, and then examined whether MHR is important for reducing loneliness over time. Results: Across both waves of data 22% (n = 121) met the criteria for MHR. The cumulative effects model found the odds of MHR were greater for male gender, higher self‐esteem, greater social resources and no subjective memory complaints. Controlling for these significant predictors, MHR significantly predicted lower total and sub‐scale scores for loneliness at wave 2. Sensitivity analysis shows these effects held at lower levels of cognitive function when the Mini‐Mental State Examination score was <25, but not at <23. Conclusions: This paper addresses a gap in research regarding the conceptualisation and measurement of resilience when facing cognitive impairment. Understanding what aspects of a person's life might enable good mental health despite cognitive impairment—to be resilient—could inform effective strategies for friends and families, along with health, and social policy and practice.

AB - Objective: There is a growing interest in how people living with dementia may achieve good outcomes and be resilient despite their health challenges. Understanding what might be important for resilience in this population is largely untested theory. Methods: The analysis draws a subsample with cognitive impairment (N = 579) from two waves of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies Wales study, a nationally representative study of community‐dwelling people aged 65+ in Wales. We constructed a measure of mental health resilience (MHR) defined as no depression, no anxiety and high well‐being. Drawing on a resilience framework, we tested univariate and cumulative effects models of the factors that enable MHR, and then examined whether MHR is important for reducing loneliness over time. Results: Across both waves of data 22% (n = 121) met the criteria for MHR. The cumulative effects model found the odds of MHR were greater for male gender, higher self‐esteem, greater social resources and no subjective memory complaints. Controlling for these significant predictors, MHR significantly predicted lower total and sub‐scale scores for loneliness at wave 2. Sensitivity analysis shows these effects held at lower levels of cognitive function when the Mini‐Mental State Examination score was <25, but not at <23. Conclusions: This paper addresses a gap in research regarding the conceptualisation and measurement of resilience when facing cognitive impairment. Understanding what aspects of a person's life might enable good mental health despite cognitive impairment—to be resilient—could inform effective strategies for friends and families, along with health, and social policy and practice.

KW - anxiety

KW - cognitive impairment

KW - dementia

KW - depression

KW - lonelisness

KW - longitudinal

KW - mental health

KW - resilience

KW - well-being

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5504

DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5504

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 1020

EP - 1028

JO - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 0885-6230

IS - 7

ER -