A methodological systematic review of meta-ethnography conduct to articulate the complex analytical phases
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 19, No. 1, 18.02.2019, p. 35.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A methodological systematic review of meta-ethnography conduct to articulate the complex analytical phases
AU - France, Emma F
AU - Uny, Isabelle
AU - Ring, Nicola
AU - Turley, Ruth L
AU - Maxwell, Margaret
AU - Duncan, Edward A S
AU - Jepson, Ruth G
AU - Roberts, Rachel J
AU - Noyes, Jane
N1 - This study was funded by an NIHR Health Service and Delivery Research (HS&DR) grant (13/114/60). The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HS&DR Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health. The systematic reviews were undertaken with the support of DECIPHer, a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence who are funded by the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council (RES-590-28-0005), Medical Research Council, the Welsh Government and the Wellcome Trust (WT087640MA), under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration.
PY - 2019/2/18
Y1 - 2019/2/18
KW - Meta-ethnography
KW - Meta-synthesis
KW - Methodology
KW - Qualitative evidence synthesis
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Research design
KW - Systematic review
U2 - 10.1186/s12874-019-0670-7
DO - 10.1186/s12874-019-0670-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 30777031
VL - 19
SP - 35
JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology
JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology
SN - 1471-2288
IS - 1
ER -