A Model for Free Speech

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

A Model for Free Speech. / Weston, Daniel.
In: International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 03.12.2022, p. 2211-2240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Weston, D 2022, 'A Model for Free Speech', International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, pp. 2211-2240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09918-1

APA

Weston, D. (2022). A Model for Free Speech. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 2211-2240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09918-1

CBE

Weston D. 2022. A Model for Free Speech. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 2211-2240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09918-1

MLA

Weston, Daniel. "A Model for Free Speech". International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 2022, 2211-2240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09918-1

VancouverVancouver

Weston D. A Model for Free Speech. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 2022 Dec 3;2211-2240. Epub 2022 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s11196-022-09918-1

Author

Weston, Daniel. / A Model for Free Speech. In: International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 2022 ; pp. 2211-2240.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Model for Free Speech

AU - Weston, Daniel

PY - 2022/12/3

Y1 - 2022/12/3

N2 - The truth-justification is an enduring explanation for valuing free speech. This paper seeks to advance an account of “assertion”, found in speech act theory, that can identify speech which contributes to truth-discovery in a nuanced way. I apply the dialectic theory of assertion which emphasises the language game of giving and asking for reasons to believe things as assertional social practice. In doing so, I consider what “moves” in this game make sense from a truth-discovery perspective, drawing together contemporary and foundational work on assertion in linguistics to fit the normative context of law. Speech act theory is often invoked in current free speech literature to identify regulable speech, but less typically to identify speech that warrants legal protection. I contextualise my theory within this existing legal work and show how the model I advocate for applies across many formulations of the truth-justification to offer comprehensive explanatory and justificatory power. I also explore the potential appeal of alternative theories of assertion and explain why they are a poor fit in comparison to the dialectical account.

AB - The truth-justification is an enduring explanation for valuing free speech. This paper seeks to advance an account of “assertion”, found in speech act theory, that can identify speech which contributes to truth-discovery in a nuanced way. I apply the dialectic theory of assertion which emphasises the language game of giving and asking for reasons to believe things as assertional social practice. In doing so, I consider what “moves” in this game make sense from a truth-discovery perspective, drawing together contemporary and foundational work on assertion in linguistics to fit the normative context of law. Speech act theory is often invoked in current free speech literature to identify regulable speech, but less typically to identify speech that warrants legal protection. I contextualise my theory within this existing legal work and show how the model I advocate for applies across many formulations of the truth-justification to offer comprehensive explanatory and justificatory power. I also explore the potential appeal of alternative theories of assertion and explain why they are a poor fit in comparison to the dialectical account.

KW - free speech

KW - speech act theory

KW - truth

KW - assertion

KW - linguistics

KW - dialectic

U2 - 10.1007/s11196-022-09918-1

DO - 10.1007/s11196-022-09918-1

M3 - Article

SP - 2211

EP - 2240

JO - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law

JF - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law

SN - 1572-8722

ER -