A qualitative exploration of practitioners' understanding of and response to child-to-parent aggression
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of interpersonal violence, Vol. 37, No. 11-12, 01.06.2022, p. NP8274-NP8296.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A qualitative exploration of practitioners' understanding of and response to child-to-parent aggression
AU - O'Toole, Sarah
AU - Tsermentseli, Stella
AU - Monks, Claire
AU - Papastergiou, Athanasia
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - There has been limited research and policy directed toward defining and understanding child-to-parent aggression (CPA), resulting in inconsistent definitions, understandings, and responses, which has a detrimental impact on families. In particular, there have been limited qualitative studies of those working on the frontline of CPA, hindering the development of effective policy. The present qualitative study therefore aimed to explore practitioner perspectives of CPA. Twenty-five practitioners from diverse fields (e.g., youth justice, police, charities) participated in four focus groups relating to their experiences of working with CPA in the United Kingdom. Thematic analysis of focus groups revealed three key themes: definitions of CPA, understanding of CPA risk factors, and responding to CPA. Practitioners understood CPA to be a broad use of aggression to intimidate and control parents and highlighted a range of individual (e.g., mental health, substance abuse) and social (e.g., parenting, gangs) risk factors for CPA. Further, practitioners felt that current methods of reporting CPA were ineffective and may have a detrimental impact on families. The findings of this study have implications for CPA policy and support the need for a multiagency and coordinated strategy for responding to CPA.
AB - There has been limited research and policy directed toward defining and understanding child-to-parent aggression (CPA), resulting in inconsistent definitions, understandings, and responses, which has a detrimental impact on families. In particular, there have been limited qualitative studies of those working on the frontline of CPA, hindering the development of effective policy. The present qualitative study therefore aimed to explore practitioner perspectives of CPA. Twenty-five practitioners from diverse fields (e.g., youth justice, police, charities) participated in four focus groups relating to their experiences of working with CPA in the United Kingdom. Thematic analysis of focus groups revealed three key themes: definitions of CPA, understanding of CPA risk factors, and responding to CPA. Practitioners understood CPA to be a broad use of aggression to intimidate and control parents and highlighted a range of individual (e.g., mental health, substance abuse) and social (e.g., parenting, gangs) risk factors for CPA. Further, practitioners felt that current methods of reporting CPA were ineffective and may have a detrimental impact on families. The findings of this study have implications for CPA policy and support the need for a multiagency and coordinated strategy for responding to CPA.
KW - Child-to-parent aggression
KW - family violence
KW - parent abuse
KW - qualitative
KW - practitioners
U2 - 10.1177/0886260520967142
DO - 10.1177/0886260520967142
M3 - Article
C2 - 33103567
VL - 37
SP - NP8274-NP8296
JO - Journal of interpersonal violence
JF - Journal of interpersonal violence
SN - 0886-2605
IS - 11-12
ER -