TY - JOUR

T1 - Addressing design and suitability barriers to Telecare use: Has anything changed?

AU - Orrell, A.J.

AU - Bentley, C.L.

AU - Powell, L.A.

AU - Orell, A.

AU - Mountain, G.A.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Issues relating to design and suitability of Telecare were raised twenty years ago. We explored the views of non-users of Telecare and examined whether design-related barriers exist today despite significant technological advances. OBJECTIVE: To examine the reasons why people choose not to adopt Telecare, with specific focus on reasons relating to design and suitability of the intervention. METHODS: Individual qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with people who were not using or had actively declined Telecare, a voice which is rarely heard in Telecare-barrier research. Framework analysis was used to identify existing and emergent themes for n=22 participants. RESULTS: Sub-themes relating to design and suitability of Telecare were explored: Stigma, i.e. Telecare as symbolising old age and lost independence; Design, including stigmatising aesthetics and inappropriate use; Alternative options, i.e. propensity to seek non-Telecare solutions; Awareness of the devices and service; and Cost. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to Telecare use are similar for both users and non-users. Our results indicate that design-related barriers have yet to be addressed despite the technological revolution. The cost model of Telecare services is becoming more consumer-driven. Thus Telecare design needs to exploit technological advances in order to improve wellbeing and allow individuals their choice and independence.

AB - BACKGROUND: Issues relating to design and suitability of Telecare were raised twenty years ago. We explored the views of non-users of Telecare and examined whether design-related barriers exist today despite significant technological advances. OBJECTIVE: To examine the reasons why people choose not to adopt Telecare, with specific focus on reasons relating to design and suitability of the intervention. METHODS: Individual qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with people who were not using or had actively declined Telecare, a voice which is rarely heard in Telecare-barrier research. Framework analysis was used to identify existing and emergent themes for n=22 participants. RESULTS: Sub-themes relating to design and suitability of Telecare were explored: Stigma, i.e. Telecare as symbolising old age and lost independence; Design, including stigmatising aesthetics and inappropriate use; Alternative options, i.e. propensity to seek non-Telecare solutions; Awareness of the devices and service; and Cost. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to Telecare use are similar for both users and non-users. Our results indicate that design-related barriers have yet to be addressed despite the technological revolution. The cost model of Telecare services is becoming more consumer-driven. Thus Telecare design needs to exploit technological advances in order to improve wellbeing and allow individuals their choice and independence.

U2 - 10.3233/TAD-150421

DO - 10.3233/TAD-150421

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 221

EP - 235

JO - Technology and Disability

JF - Technology and Disability

SN - 1055-4181

IS - 4

ER -