Research Portal

AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 5: Advanced Analytic Methods

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Standard Standard

AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 5: Advanced Analytic Methods. / Pigott, Terri; Noyes, Jane; Umscheid, Craig A et al.
In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 90, No. October, 10.2017, p. 37-42.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

HarvardHarvard

Pigott, T, Noyes, J, Umscheid, CA, Myers, E, Morton, SC, Fu, R, Sanders-Schmidler, GD, Devine, EEB, Murad, MH, Kelly, MP, Fonnesbeck, C, Petticrew, M, Kahwati, L & Beretvas, SN 2017, 'AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 5: Advanced Analytic Methods', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 90, no. October, pp. 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.015

APA

Pigott, T., Noyes, J., Umscheid, C. A., Myers, E., Morton, S. C., Fu, R., Sanders-Schmidler, G. D., Devine, E. E. B., Murad, M. H., Kelly, M. P., Fonnesbeck, C., Petticrew, M., Kahwati, L., & Beretvas, S. N. (2017). AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 5: Advanced Analytic Methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 90(October), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.015

CBE

Pigott T, Noyes J, Umscheid CA, Myers E, Morton SC, Fu R, Sanders-Schmidler GD, Devine EEB, Murad MH, Kelly MP, et al. 2017. AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 5: Advanced Analytic Methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 90(October):37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.015

MLA

Pigott, Terri et al. "AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 5: Advanced Analytic Methods". Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2017, 90(October). 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.015

VancouverVancouver

Pigott T, Noyes J, Umscheid CA, Myers E, Morton SC, Fu R et al. AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 5: Advanced Analytic Methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2017 Oct;90(October):37-42. Epub 2017 Jul 15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.015

Author

Pigott, Terri ; Noyes, Jane ; Umscheid, Craig A et al. / AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 5 : Advanced Analytic Methods. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2017 ; Vol. 90, No. October. pp. 37-42.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews - Paper 5

T2 - Advanced Analytic Methods

AU - Pigott, Terri

AU - Noyes, Jane

AU - Umscheid, Craig A

AU - Myers, Evan

AU - Morton, Sally C

AU - Fu, Rongwei

AU - Sanders-Schmidler, Gillian D

AU - Devine, Emily E Beth

AU - Murad, M Hassan

AU - Kelly, Michael P

AU - Fonnesbeck, Chris

AU - Petticrew, Mark

AU - Kahwati, Leila

AU - Beretvas, S Natasha

N1 - This work was funded by the following contracts HHSA290201200004C

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - BACKGROUND: Advanced analytic methods for synthesizing evidence about complex interventions continue to be developed. In this paper, we emphasize that the specific research question posed in the review should be used as a guide for choosing the appropriate analytic method.RATIONALE: We present advanced analytic approaches that address four common questions that guide reviews of complex interventions: 1) How effective is the intervention?; 2) For whom does the intervention work and in what contexts?; 3) What happens when the intervention is implemented?; and 4) What decisions are possible given the results of the synthesis?DISCUSSION: The analytic approaches presented in this paper are particularly useful when each primary study differs in components, mechanisms of action, context, implementation, timing, and many other domains.

AB - BACKGROUND: Advanced analytic methods for synthesizing evidence about complex interventions continue to be developed. In this paper, we emphasize that the specific research question posed in the review should be used as a guide for choosing the appropriate analytic method.RATIONALE: We present advanced analytic approaches that address four common questions that guide reviews of complex interventions: 1) How effective is the intervention?; 2) For whom does the intervention work and in what contexts?; 3) What happens when the intervention is implemented?; and 4) What decisions are possible given the results of the synthesis?DISCUSSION: The analytic approaches presented in this paper are particularly useful when each primary study differs in components, mechanisms of action, context, implementation, timing, and many other domains.

KW - Systematic review

KW - Qualitative synthesis

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Decision analysis

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 28720512

VL - 90

SP - 37

EP - 42

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - October

ER -