Air pollution abatement from Green-Blue-Grey infrastructure
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: The Innovation Geoscience, Vol. 2, No. 4, 100100, 03.12.2024.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Air pollution abatement from Green-Blue-Grey infrastructure
AU - Kumar, Prashant
AU - Corada, Karina
AU - Debele, Sisay E.
AU - Emygdio, Ana Paula Mendes
AU - Abhijith, KV
AU - Hassan, Hala
AU - Broomandi, Parya
AU - Baldauf, Richard
AU - Calvillo, Nerea
AU - Cao, Shi-Jie
AU - Desrivières, Sylvane
AU - Feng, Zhuangbo
AU - Gallagher, John
AU - Kjeldsen, Thomas Rodding
AU - Khan, Anwar Ali
AU - Khare, Mukesh
AU - Kota, Sri Harsha
AU - Li, Baizhan
AU - Malham, Shelagh K
AU - McNabola, Aonghus
AU - Namdeo, Anil
AU - Nema, Arvind Kumar
AU - Reis, Stefan
AU - Sm, Shiva Nagendra
AU - Tiwary, Abhishek
AU - Vardoulakis, Sotiris
AU - Wenk, Jannis
AU - Wang, Fang
AU - Wang, Junqi
AU - Woolf, Darren
AU - Yao, Runming
AU - Jones, Laurence
PY - 2024/12/3
Y1 - 2024/12/3
N2 - Green-blue-grey infrastructure (GBGI) offers environmental benefits inurban areas, yet its impact on air pollution is under-researched, and theliterature fragmented. This review evaluates quantitative studies on GBGI'scapability to mitigate air pollution, compares their specific pollutantremoval processes, and identifies areas for further investigation. Of the 51GBGI types reviewed, only 22 provided quantitative pollution reduction data.Street trees and mixed-GBGI are the most studied GBGIs, with efficacyinfluenced by wind, GBGI type vegetation characteristics, and urbanmorphology. Negative percentages denote worsening air quality, whilepositive reflect improvement. The 22 different GBGI grouped into eight maincategories provide an average (±s.d.) reduction in air pollution of 16±21%,with substantial reduction shown by linear features (23±21%), parks(22±34%), constructed GI (14±25%), and other non-sealed urban areas(14±20%). Other individual GBGI reducing air pollutants include woodlands(21±38%), hedges (14±25%), green walls (14±27%), shrubland (12±20%),green roofs (13±23%), parks (9±36%), and mixed-GBGI (7±23%). On average,GBGI reduced PM1, PM2.5, PM10, UFP and BC by 13±21%, 1±25%, 7±42%,27±27% and 16±41%, respectively. GBGI also lowered gaseous pollutantsCO, O3 and NOx by 10±21%, 7±21% and 12±36%, on average, respectively.Linear (e.g., street trees and hedges) and constructed (e.g., green walls)features can impact local air quality, positively or negatively, based on theconfiguration and density of the built environment. Street trees generallyshowed adverse effects in street canyons and beneficial outcomes in openroadconditions. Climate change could worsen air pollution problems andimpact GBGI effectiveness by shifting climate zones. In Europe and China,climate shifts are anticipated to affect 8 of the 22 GBGIs, with the restexpected to remain resilient. Despite GBGI's potential to enhance air quality,the meta-analysis highlights the need for a standardised reporting structureor to enable meaningful comparisons and effectively integrate findingsinto urban pollution and climate strategies.
AB - Green-blue-grey infrastructure (GBGI) offers environmental benefits inurban areas, yet its impact on air pollution is under-researched, and theliterature fragmented. This review evaluates quantitative studies on GBGI'scapability to mitigate air pollution, compares their specific pollutantremoval processes, and identifies areas for further investigation. Of the 51GBGI types reviewed, only 22 provided quantitative pollution reduction data.Street trees and mixed-GBGI are the most studied GBGIs, with efficacyinfluenced by wind, GBGI type vegetation characteristics, and urbanmorphology. Negative percentages denote worsening air quality, whilepositive reflect improvement. The 22 different GBGI grouped into eight maincategories provide an average (±s.d.) reduction in air pollution of 16±21%,with substantial reduction shown by linear features (23±21%), parks(22±34%), constructed GI (14±25%), and other non-sealed urban areas(14±20%). Other individual GBGI reducing air pollutants include woodlands(21±38%), hedges (14±25%), green walls (14±27%), shrubland (12±20%),green roofs (13±23%), parks (9±36%), and mixed-GBGI (7±23%). On average,GBGI reduced PM1, PM2.5, PM10, UFP and BC by 13±21%, 1±25%, 7±42%,27±27% and 16±41%, respectively. GBGI also lowered gaseous pollutantsCO, O3 and NOx by 10±21%, 7±21% and 12±36%, on average, respectively.Linear (e.g., street trees and hedges) and constructed (e.g., green walls)features can impact local air quality, positively or negatively, based on theconfiguration and density of the built environment. Street trees generallyshowed adverse effects in street canyons and beneficial outcomes in openroadconditions. Climate change could worsen air pollution problems andimpact GBGI effectiveness by shifting climate zones. In Europe and China,climate shifts are anticipated to affect 8 of the 22 GBGIs, with the restexpected to remain resilient. Despite GBGI's potential to enhance air quality,the meta-analysis highlights the need for a standardised reporting structureor to enable meaningful comparisons and effectively integrate findingsinto urban pollution and climate strategies.
KW - Green-blue-grey infrastructure
KW - Urban design
KW - Passive solutions
KW - Air pollution abatement
KW - Sustainable development goals
U2 - 10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2024.100100
DO - 10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2024.100100
M3 - Article
VL - 2
JO - The Innovation Geoscience
JF - The Innovation Geoscience
SN - 2959-8753
IS - 4
M1 - 100100
ER -