Standard Standard

All that glitters is not gold: The effect of top-down participation on conservation knowledge, attitudes and institutional trust in a Central Indian tiger reserve. / Macura, Biljana; Secco, Laura; Pisani, Elena et al.
In: Regional Environmental Change, Vol. 16, No. August, 01.08.2016, p. 125-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Macura B, Secco L, Pisani E, Pullin A, Reyes-García V. All that glitters is not gold: The effect of top-down participation on conservation knowledge, attitudes and institutional trust in a Central Indian tiger reserve. Regional Environmental Change. 2016 Aug 1;16(August):125-140. Epub 2016 May 27. doi: 10.1007/s10113-016-0978-3

Author

Macura, Biljana ; Secco, Laura ; Pisani, Elena et al. / All that glitters is not gold : The effect of top-down participation on conservation knowledge, attitudes and institutional trust in a Central Indian tiger reserve. In: Regional Environmental Change. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. August. pp. 125-140.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - All that glitters is not gold

T2 - The effect of top-down participation on conservation knowledge, attitudes and institutional trust in a Central Indian tiger reserve

AU - Macura, Biljana

AU - Secco, Laura

AU - Pisani, Elena

AU - Pullin, Andrew

AU - Reyes-García, Victoria

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Researchers and policymakers emphasize that people’s involvement in forest management can secure their support of conservation initiatives. However, the evidence on the effectiveness of top-down participation is weak. This study uses cross-sectional household data from 16 villages in the buffer zone of Pench Tiger Reserve (Madhya Pradesh) in India to contribute to the evidence base of such assumption. Using a propensity score matching to control for observable bias, we evaluate the effects of two state-driven incentive-based participatory projects, i.e. the Joint Forest Management and Ecodevelopment, on selected social outcomes. Specifically, we measured local people conservation knowledge, biodiversity attitudes as well as trust in and satisfaction with the tiger reserve management authorities. We found that the effects of participatory management on conservation knowledge were positive, but negligible. We found no significant effects on local people’s biodiversity attitudes, trust and satisfaction with the tiger reserve management authorities. Top-down and externally induced participation may explain our results. Our findings clearly indicate that the effectiveness of participatory conservation interventions is conditional on the level and nature of local participation. Top-down participatory projects may not be sufficient to generate local support of conservation and in some cases, they may even exacerbate local conflicts.

AB - Researchers and policymakers emphasize that people’s involvement in forest management can secure their support of conservation initiatives. However, the evidence on the effectiveness of top-down participation is weak. This study uses cross-sectional household data from 16 villages in the buffer zone of Pench Tiger Reserve (Madhya Pradesh) in India to contribute to the evidence base of such assumption. Using a propensity score matching to control for observable bias, we evaluate the effects of two state-driven incentive-based participatory projects, i.e. the Joint Forest Management and Ecodevelopment, on selected social outcomes. Specifically, we measured local people conservation knowledge, biodiversity attitudes as well as trust in and satisfaction with the tiger reserve management authorities. We found that the effects of participatory management on conservation knowledge were positive, but negligible. We found no significant effects on local people’s biodiversity attitudes, trust and satisfaction with the tiger reserve management authorities. Top-down and externally induced participation may explain our results. Our findings clearly indicate that the effectiveness of participatory conservation interventions is conditional on the level and nature of local participation. Top-down participatory projects may not be sufficient to generate local support of conservation and in some cases, they may even exacerbate local conflicts.

U2 - 10.1007/s10113-016-0978-3

DO - 10.1007/s10113-016-0978-3

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 125

EP - 140

JO - Regional Environmental Change

JF - Regional Environmental Change

SN - 1436-3798

IS - August

ER -