Are stabilized biosolids a eutrophication risk?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Are stabilized biosolids a eutrophication risk? / Withers, P.J.; Flynn, N.J.; Warren, G.P.
In: Soil Use and Management, Vol. 32, No. S1, 06.2016, p. 138-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Withers, PJ, Flynn, NJ & Warren, GP 2016, 'Are stabilized biosolids a eutrophication risk?', Soil Use and Management, vol. 32, no. S1, pp. 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12219

APA

Withers, P. J., Flynn, N. J., & Warren, G. P. (2016). Are stabilized biosolids a eutrophication risk? Soil Use and Management, 32(S1), 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12219

CBE

Withers PJ, Flynn NJ, Warren GP. 2016. Are stabilized biosolids a eutrophication risk?. Soil Use and Management. 32(S1):138-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12219

MLA

Withers, P.J., N.J. Flynn and G.P. Warren. "Are stabilized biosolids a eutrophication risk?". Soil Use and Management. 2016, 32(S1). 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12219

VancouverVancouver

Withers PJ, Flynn NJ, Warren GP. Are stabilized biosolids a eutrophication risk? Soil Use and Management. 2016 Jun;32(S1):138-148. Epub 2015 Sept 28. doi: 10.1111/sum.12219

Author

Withers, P.J. ; Flynn, N.J. ; Warren, G.P. / Are stabilized biosolids a eutrophication risk?. In: Soil Use and Management. 2016 ; Vol. 32, No. S1. pp. 138-148.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are stabilized biosolids a eutrophication risk?

AU - Withers, P.J.

AU - Flynn, N.J.

AU - Warren, G.P.

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - Regular application of phosphorus (P)-rich biosolids to limited land areas poses a potential eutrophication risk because of rapid soil P accumulation and increased transport of P in land runoff to receiving waterbodies. To assess the effect of biosolid-P on eutrophication risk, we tested the effect of a range of stabilized biosolids on soil test P (STP) accumulation (measured by Olsen-P), and resulting increases in the potential release of soluble P to runoff (measured by soil water-extractable P (WEP)), for five major UK soil types in a 90-day incubation study. Rates of Olsen-P increase (range 1–18% of total P applied) were greatest for lime-stabilized biosolids and least for Fe-rich and thermally dried biosolids. Increases in Olsen-P were not always accompanied by increases in WEP. Biosolids which contained large amounts of P-binding elements (e.g. Ca and Fe) actually reduced WEP concentrations on poorly buffered soils. There was less effect of biosolid type on highly buffered soils, which continued to release low amounts of soluble P even at high Olsen-P concentrations (up to 57 mg/kg). Soil WEP concentrations tended to increase more rapidly above ca. 20% soil P saturation, when the P sorption index was >6, and for biosolids with a molar Fe:P ratio of >1.2, but these potential thresholds require further verification under field conditions. Our results suggest the eutrophication risk associated with biosolids application can be overestimated, and they support the more widespread use of this valuable and renewable nutrient resource on some UK soils.

AB - Regular application of phosphorus (P)-rich biosolids to limited land areas poses a potential eutrophication risk because of rapid soil P accumulation and increased transport of P in land runoff to receiving waterbodies. To assess the effect of biosolid-P on eutrophication risk, we tested the effect of a range of stabilized biosolids on soil test P (STP) accumulation (measured by Olsen-P), and resulting increases in the potential release of soluble P to runoff (measured by soil water-extractable P (WEP)), for five major UK soil types in a 90-day incubation study. Rates of Olsen-P increase (range 1–18% of total P applied) were greatest for lime-stabilized biosolids and least for Fe-rich and thermally dried biosolids. Increases in Olsen-P were not always accompanied by increases in WEP. Biosolids which contained large amounts of P-binding elements (e.g. Ca and Fe) actually reduced WEP concentrations on poorly buffered soils. There was less effect of biosolid type on highly buffered soils, which continued to release low amounts of soluble P even at high Olsen-P concentrations (up to 57 mg/kg). Soil WEP concentrations tended to increase more rapidly above ca. 20% soil P saturation, when the P sorption index was >6, and for biosolids with a molar Fe:P ratio of >1.2, but these potential thresholds require further verification under field conditions. Our results suggest the eutrophication risk associated with biosolids application can be overestimated, and they support the more widespread use of this valuable and renewable nutrient resource on some UK soils.

U2 - 10.1111/sum.12219

DO - 10.1111/sum.12219

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 138

EP - 148

JO - Soil Use and Management

JF - Soil Use and Management

SN - 0266-0032

IS - S1

ER -