Bilingualism and aging: A focused neuroscientific review
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of Neurolinguistics, Vol. 54, 100890, 05.2020.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Bilingualism and aging: A focused neuroscientific review
AU - Zhang, Haoyun
AU - Wu, Yan Jing
AU - Thierry, Guillaume
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Research has suggested that using two or more languages on a daily basis helps older adults maintain a heightened functional state and improves neurocomputational efficiency. In this review, we discuss studies that have examined the effect of life-long bilingualism on age-related cognitive and neural decline, with a focus on discrepancies between different sources of evidence. We intend to outline and characterize factors which might explain inconsistencies between studies claiming that bilingualism has neurocognitive benefits and those that failed to find such evidence. We argue that individual variation in language proficiency and exposure, especially language switching frequency and daily frequency of use of the two languages, likely account for a significant chunk of the inconsistencies found in the literature and constrain the effectiveness of bilingualism as a cognitive and brain reserve factor. Finally, we briefly review studies of cognitive intervention and speculate on the potential of developing language training protocols to increase cognitive and neural resilience in older adults.
AB - Research has suggested that using two or more languages on a daily basis helps older adults maintain a heightened functional state and improves neurocomputational efficiency. In this review, we discuss studies that have examined the effect of life-long bilingualism on age-related cognitive and neural decline, with a focus on discrepancies between different sources of evidence. We intend to outline and characterize factors which might explain inconsistencies between studies claiming that bilingualism has neurocognitive benefits and those that failed to find such evidence. We argue that individual variation in language proficiency and exposure, especially language switching frequency and daily frequency of use of the two languages, likely account for a significant chunk of the inconsistencies found in the literature and constrain the effectiveness of bilingualism as a cognitive and brain reserve factor. Finally, we briefly review studies of cognitive intervention and speculate on the potential of developing language training protocols to increase cognitive and neural resilience in older adults.
KW - Aging
KW - Bilingualism
KW - Cognitive Reserve
KW - Brain Reserve
KW - Language Switching
KW - Language Exposure
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100890
DO - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100890
M3 - Article
VL - 54
JO - Journal of Neurolinguistics
JF - Journal of Neurolinguistics
SN - 0911-6044
M1 - 100890
ER -