Border Security Fencing and Wildlife: The End of the Transboundary Paradigm in Eurasia?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  • John D.C. Linell
    Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim
  • Arie Trouwborst
    Tilburg University
  • Luigi Botani
    University of Rome
  • Prtra Kaczensky
    University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
  • Djuro Harber
    University of Zagreb
  • Slaven Reljic
    University of Zagreb
  • Josip Kusak
    University of Zagreb
  • Aleksandra Majic
    University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Tomaz Skrbinsek
    University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Hubert Potocnik
    University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Matthew Hayward
  • E.J. Milner-Gulland
    Biodiversity Institute Oxford
  • Bayarbaatar Buuveibaatar
    Wildlife Conservation Society, Ulaanbaatar
  • Kirk A. Olson
    Wildlife Conservation Society, Ulaanbaatar
  • Lkhagvasuren Badamjav
    Wildlife Conservation Society, Ulaanbaatar
  • Richard Bischof
    Norwegian University of Life Sciences
  • Steffen Zuther
    Association for the Conservation of Biodiversity of Kazakhstan, Astana
  • Urs Breitenmoser
    KORA, Muri bei Bern
The ongoing refugee crisis in Europe has seen many countries rush to construct border security fencing to divert or control the flow of people. This follows a trend of border fence construction across Eurasia during the post-9/11 era. This development has gone largely unnoticed by conservation biologists during an era in which, ironically, transboundary cooperation has emerged as a conservation paradigm. These fences represent a major threat to wildlife because they can cause mortality, obstruct access to seasonally important resources, and reduce effective population size. We summarise the extent of the issue and propose concrete mitigation measures.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1002483
JournalPLoS Biology
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jun 2016

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations