Case Comment: Martin v Kogan
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
Standard Standard
In: European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 40, No. 12, 12.2018, p. 817-820.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Case Comment: Martin v Kogan
AU - Hyland, Mark
AU - Howard, Michael
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Comments on Martin v Kogan (IPEC), setting out the applicable tests for joint authorship, and accordingly, whether the defendant's contribution rendered her joint author of the claimant's screenplay. Considers the case's contribution to determining what is "substantial" for the purposes of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s.10(1) and its consequences for the creative industries and practitioners in the field.
AB - Comments on Martin v Kogan (IPEC), setting out the applicable tests for joint authorship, and accordingly, whether the defendant's contribution rendered her joint author of the claimant's screenplay. Considers the case's contribution to determining what is "substantial" for the purposes of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s.10(1) and its consequences for the creative industries and practitioners in the field.
KW - Joint Authorship
KW - Test for Control
KW - Copyright
M3 - Article
VL - 40
SP - 817
EP - 820
JO - European Intellectual Property Review
JF - European Intellectual Property Review
SN - 0142-0461
IS - 12
ER -