Case Study 5.3: Using Point-of-View Cameras to Support Teaching, Assessment and Feedback

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Standard Standard

Case Study 5.3: Using Point-of-View Cameras to Support Teaching, Assessment and Feedback. / French, Graham; Jones, Rhys Coetmor.
Teaching and Learning with Innovative Technologies in Higher Education. New York, NY: Routledge, 2025. p. 171-177.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

HarvardHarvard

French, G & Jones, RC 2025, Case Study 5.3: Using Point-of-View Cameras to Support Teaching, Assessment and Feedback. in Teaching and Learning with Innovative Technologies in Higher Education. Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 171-177.

APA

French, G., & Jones, R. C. (2025). Case Study 5.3: Using Point-of-View Cameras to Support Teaching, Assessment and Feedback. In Teaching and Learning with Innovative Technologies in Higher Education (pp. 171-177). Routledge.

CBE

French G, Jones RC. 2025. Case Study 5.3: Using Point-of-View Cameras to Support Teaching, Assessment and Feedback. In Teaching and Learning with Innovative Technologies in Higher Education. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 171-177.

MLA

French, Graham and Rhys Coetmor Jones "Case Study 5.3: Using Point-of-View Cameras to Support Teaching, Assessment and Feedback". Teaching and Learning with Innovative Technologies in Higher Education. Chapter 5, New York, NY: Routledge. 2025, 171-177.

VancouverVancouver

French G, Jones RC. Case Study 5.3: Using Point-of-View Cameras to Support Teaching, Assessment and Feedback. In Teaching and Learning with Innovative Technologies in Higher Education. New York, NY: Routledge. 2025. p. 171-177

Author

French, Graham ; Jones, Rhys Coetmor. / Case Study 5.3: Using Point-of-View Cameras to Support Teaching, Assessment and Feedback. Teaching and Learning with Innovative Technologies in Higher Education. New York, NY : Routledge, 2025. pp. 171-177

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Case Study 5.3: Using Point-of-View Cameras to Support Teaching, Assessment and Feedback

AU - French, Graham

AU - Jones, Rhys Coetmor

PY - 2025/1/1

Y1 - 2025/1/1

N2 - Teacher education programs frequently adopt andragogical approaches that value modeling and direct experience as teaching tools (Loughran and Hamilton, 2016) and so embrace constructivist epistemology (Richardson, 1997). While this is often tempered with classroom or lecture-based instruction, it is perhaps most prevalent in pre-service programs for physical education (PE) (Byra, 2006; Capel and Blair, 2007; Kirk, 2010) and adventure education (AE) (Backman, 2015; Brown, 2006; North, 2020). However, when the global COVID-19 pandemic enforced restrictions on teaching practices at Higher Education institutions in early 2020, these modeling and direct experience sessions were significantly curtailed, and in some cases completely prohibited.Our university was not alone in facing challenges with overseas students being unable to attend sessions. We had mixed groups of students to teach that comprised of those present and able to attend, and those unable to attend other than online sessions. Working on the PE and AE postgraduate initial teacher education (ITE) programs at Bangor University, we sought alternative ways to provide students with the required experiences.We viewed this situation as an opportunity to develop our practice with andragogic approaches that would enhance, rather than just replace, what had gone before. This case study details this development, including a description of the technology we used, how this was applied and developed during post-COVID restrictions and a brief evaluation of the impact of this new practice.

AB - Teacher education programs frequently adopt andragogical approaches that value modeling and direct experience as teaching tools (Loughran and Hamilton, 2016) and so embrace constructivist epistemology (Richardson, 1997). While this is often tempered with classroom or lecture-based instruction, it is perhaps most prevalent in pre-service programs for physical education (PE) (Byra, 2006; Capel and Blair, 2007; Kirk, 2010) and adventure education (AE) (Backman, 2015; Brown, 2006; North, 2020). However, when the global COVID-19 pandemic enforced restrictions on teaching practices at Higher Education institutions in early 2020, these modeling and direct experience sessions were significantly curtailed, and in some cases completely prohibited.Our university was not alone in facing challenges with overseas students being unable to attend sessions. We had mixed groups of students to teach that comprised of those present and able to attend, and those unable to attend other than online sessions. Working on the PE and AE postgraduate initial teacher education (ITE) programs at Bangor University, we sought alternative ways to provide students with the required experiences.We viewed this situation as an opportunity to develop our practice with andragogic approaches that would enhance, rather than just replace, what had gone before. This case study details this development, including a description of the technology we used, how this was applied and developed during post-COVID restrictions and a brief evaluation of the impact of this new practice.

KW - point of view camera

KW - go-pro

KW - Teaching

KW - Physical education

KW - adventure education

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-032-62726-7

SP - 171

EP - 177

BT - Teaching and Learning with Innovative Technologies in Higher Education

PB - Routledge

CY - New York, NY

ER -