Choosing best practices for managing impacts of trawl fishing on seabed habitats and biota
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Fish and Fisheries, Vol. 21, No. 2, 03.2020, p. 319-337.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Choosing best practices for managing impacts of trawl fishing on seabed habitats and biota
AU - McConnaughey, R.A.
AU - Hiddink, Jan Geert
AU - Jennings, Simon
AU - Pitcher, Roland
AU - Kaiser, Michel
AU - Suuronen, Petri
AU - Sciberras, Marija
AU - Rijnsdorp, Adriaan D.
AU - Collie, Jeremy
AU - Mazor, Tessa
AU - Amoroso, R.O.
AU - Parma, Ana
AU - Hilborn, R.
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Bottom trawling accounts for almost one quarter of global fish landings but may also have significant and unwanted impacts on seabed habitats and biota. Management measures and voluntary industry actions can reduce these impacts, helping to meet sustainability objectives for fisheries, conservation and environmental management. These include changes in gear design and operation of trawls, spatial controls, impact quotas and effort controls. We review nine different measures and actions and use published studies and a simple conceptual model to evaluate and compare their performance. The risks and benefits of these management measures depend on the extent to which the fishery is already achieving management objectives for target stocks and the characteristics of the management system that is already in place. We offer guidance on identifying best practices for trawl‐fisheries management and show that best practices and their likelihood of reducing trawling impacts depend on local, national and regional management objectives and priorities, societal values and resources for implementation. There is no universal best practice, and multiple management measures and industry actions are required to meet sustainability objectives and improve trade‐offs between food production and environmental protection.
AB - Bottom trawling accounts for almost one quarter of global fish landings but may also have significant and unwanted impacts on seabed habitats and biota. Management measures and voluntary industry actions can reduce these impacts, helping to meet sustainability objectives for fisheries, conservation and environmental management. These include changes in gear design and operation of trawls, spatial controls, impact quotas and effort controls. We review nine different measures and actions and use published studies and a simple conceptual model to evaluate and compare their performance. The risks and benefits of these management measures depend on the extent to which the fishery is already achieving management objectives for target stocks and the characteristics of the management system that is already in place. We offer guidance on identifying best practices for trawl‐fisheries management and show that best practices and their likelihood of reducing trawling impacts depend on local, national and regional management objectives and priorities, societal values and resources for implementation. There is no universal best practice, and multiple management measures and industry actions are required to meet sustainability objectives and improve trade‐offs between food production and environmental protection.
KW - benthos
KW - dredging
KW - ecosystem-based fishery management
KW - impact-yield model
KW - trade-offs
KW - trawling
U2 - 10.1111/faf.12431
DO - 10.1111/faf.12431
M3 - Article
VL - 21
SP - 319
EP - 337
JO - Fish and Fisheries
JF - Fish and Fisheries
SN - 1467-2960
IS - 2
ER -