Clarifying the role of inorganic carbon in blue carbon policy and practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Electronic versions

DOI

  • W.R. Turrell
    Marine Scotland, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen
  • W.E.N. Austin
    University of St. Andrews
  • S.P. Philbrick
    Marine Scotland, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen
  • C. Tilbrook
    NatureScot
  • H. Kennedy
Since the term “blue carbon” was coined by the report of Nellerman et al. (2009) the marine carbon cycle has firmly entered the realm of marine policy alongside its terrestrial neighbour, “green carbon” (Crooks et al., 2018). Many marine policy decisions rely on accurate information concerning the stocks of blue carbon in a region, the annual sequestration rates associated with those stocks and the threats posed to those stocks by human activities, and especially recently by bottom-trawling (e.g., Sala et al., 2021). Hence policy officials are reliant on accurate blue carbon scientific advice. However, at the present moment there is one topic that is contributing confusion to policy-science understanding, and that is the topic of organic vs. inorganic carbon. The aim of this short note is to clarify the differences between these two types of blue carbon and to recommend how they are treated in policy formulation and the provision of scientific advice.

Keywords

  • Blue carbon, Climate change mitigation, Policy formulation, Marine protection, Nature based solution
Original languageUnknown
Pages (from-to)105873
Number of pages1
JournalMarine Policy
Volume157
Early online date4 Oct 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2023
View graph of relations