Clinical relevance of findings in trials of CBT for depression

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

  • Peter Lepping
  • R. Whittington
    University of Liverpool
  • R.S. Sambhi
    Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
  • S. Lane
    University of Liverpool
  • Robert Poole
  • Stefan Leucht
    TU-München
  • P. Cuijpers
    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • R. McGabe
    Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust
  • W. Waheed
    University of Manchester
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is beneficial in depression. Symptom scores can be translated into Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale scores to indicate clinical relevance. We aimed to assess the clinical relevance of findings of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of CBT in depression. We identified RCTs of CBT that used the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD). HAMD scores were translated into Clinical Global Impression – Change scale (CGI-I) scores to measure clinical relevance. One hundred and seventy datasets from 82 studies were included. The mean percentage HAMD change for treatment arms was 53.66%, and 29.81% for control arms, a statistically significant difference. Combined active therapies showed the biggest improvement on CGI-I score, followed by CBT alone. All active treatments had better than expected HAMD percentage reduction and CGI-I scores. CBT has a clinically relevant effect in depression, with a notional CGI-I score of 2.2, indicating a significant clinical response. The non-specific or placebo effect of being in a psychotherapy trial was a 29% reduction of HAMD.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-211
JournalEuropean Psychiatry
Volume45
Early online date25 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2017

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations