Closely related protist strains have different grazing impacts on natural bacterial communities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Closely related protist strains have different grazing impacts on natural bacterial communities. / Glücksman, Edvard; Bell, Thomas; Griffiths, Robert I. et al.
In: Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 12, No. 12, 03.12.2010, p. 3105-3113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Glücksman E, Bell T, Griffiths RI, Bass D. Closely related protist strains have different grazing impacts on natural bacterial communities. Environmental Microbiology. 2010 Dec 3;12(12):3105-3113. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02283.x

Author

Glücksman, Edvard ; Bell, Thomas ; Griffiths, Robert I. et al. / Closely related protist strains have different grazing impacts on natural bacterial communities. In: Environmental Microbiology. 2010 ; Vol. 12, No. 12. pp. 3105-3113.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Closely related protist strains have different grazing impacts on natural bacterial communities

AU - Glücksman, Edvard

AU - Bell, Thomas

AU - Griffiths, Robert I.

AU - Bass, David

N1 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02283.x

PY - 2010/12/3

Y1 - 2010/12/3

N2 - Summary Heterotrophic protists are abundant in most environments and exert a strong top-down control on bacterial communities. However, little is known about how selective most protists are with respect to their bacterial prey. We conducted feeding trials using cercomonad and glissomonad Cercozoa by assaying them on a standardized, diverse bacterial community washed from beech leaf litter. For each of the nine protist strains assayed here, we measured several phenotypic traits (cell volume, speed, plasticity and protist cell density) that we anticipated would be important for their feeding ecology. We also estimated the genetic relatedness of the strains based on the 18S rRNA gene. We found that the nine protist strains had significantly different impacts on both the abundance and the composition of the bacterial communities. Both the phylogenetic distance between protist strains and differences in protist strain traits were important in explaining variation in the bacterial communities. Of the morphological traits that we investigated, protist cell volume and morphological plasticity (the extent to which cells showed amoeboid cell shape flexibility) were most important in determining bacterial community composition. The results demonstrate that closely related and morphologically similar protist species can have different impacts on their prey base.

AB - Summary Heterotrophic protists are abundant in most environments and exert a strong top-down control on bacterial communities. However, little is known about how selective most protists are with respect to their bacterial prey. We conducted feeding trials using cercomonad and glissomonad Cercozoa by assaying them on a standardized, diverse bacterial community washed from beech leaf litter. For each of the nine protist strains assayed here, we measured several phenotypic traits (cell volume, speed, plasticity and protist cell density) that we anticipated would be important for their feeding ecology. We also estimated the genetic relatedness of the strains based on the 18S rRNA gene. We found that the nine protist strains had significantly different impacts on both the abundance and the composition of the bacterial communities. Both the phylogenetic distance between protist strains and differences in protist strain traits were important in explaining variation in the bacterial communities. Of the morphological traits that we investigated, protist cell volume and morphological plasticity (the extent to which cells showed amoeboid cell shape flexibility) were most important in determining bacterial community composition. The results demonstrate that closely related and morphologically similar protist species can have different impacts on their prey base.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02283.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02283.x

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 3105

EP - 3113

JO - Environmental Microbiology

JF - Environmental Microbiology

SN - 1462-2912

IS - 12

ER -