Communicating Uncertainty During Public Health Emergency Events: A Systematic Review
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Review of Communication Research , Vol. 7, 2019, p. 67-108.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Communicating Uncertainty During Public Health Emergency Events
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Sopory, Pradeep
AU - Day, Ashleigh
AU - Novak, Julie
AU - Eckert, Stine
AU - Wilkins, Lillian
AU - Padgett, Donyale
AU - Noyes, Jane
AU - Barakji, Fatima
AU - Liu, Juan
AU - Fowler, Beth N.
AU - Guzman-Barcenas, Javier
AU - Nagayko, Anna
AU - Nickell, Jacob J.
AU - Donahue, Damecia
AU - Daniels, Kimberley
AU - Allen, Thomas
AU - Alexander, Nyka
AU - Vanderford, Marsha L.
AU - Gamhewage, Gaya M.
N1 - doi: 10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.019
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - To answer the question, What are the best ways to communicate uncertainties to public audiences, at-risk communities, and stakeholdersduring public health emergency events? we conducted a systematic review of published studies, grey literature, and media reportsin English and other United Nations (UN) languages Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian, and Spanish. Almost 2900 Englishand 8600 other UN languages titles and abstracts were scanned of which 33 English and 13 other UN languages data-basedprimary studies were selected, which were classified into four methodological streams: Quantitative-comparison groups;Quantitative-descriptive survey; Qualitative; and Mixed-method and case-study. Study characteristics (study method,country, emergency type, emergency phase, at-risk population) and study findings (in narrative form) were extracted fromindividual studies. The findings were synthesized within methodological streams and evaluated for certainty and confidence.These within-method findings were next synthesized across methodological streams to develop an overarching synthesisof findings. The findings showed that country coverage focused on high and middle-income countries in Asia, Europe,North America, and Oceania, and the event most covered was infectious disease followed by flood and earthquake. Thefindings also showed that uncertainty in public health emergency events is a multi-faceted concept with multiple components.There is universal agreement, with some exceptions, that communication to the public should include explicit informationabout event uncertainties, and this information must be consistent and presented in an easy to understand format. Additionally,uncertainty related to events requires a distinction between uncertainty information and uncertainty experience. At-riskpopulations experience event uncertainty in lives full of uncertainties from other sources. Event uncertainty is experiencedand uncertainty information may be understood and misunderstood in the same general ways by the public, experts, andpolicy makers. Experience of event uncertainty may be a defining feature for media professionals as well due to contradictoryand inconsistent information in the environment.
AB - To answer the question, What are the best ways to communicate uncertainties to public audiences, at-risk communities, and stakeholdersduring public health emergency events? we conducted a systematic review of published studies, grey literature, and media reportsin English and other United Nations (UN) languages Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian, and Spanish. Almost 2900 Englishand 8600 other UN languages titles and abstracts were scanned of which 33 English and 13 other UN languages data-basedprimary studies were selected, which were classified into four methodological streams: Quantitative-comparison groups;Quantitative-descriptive survey; Qualitative; and Mixed-method and case-study. Study characteristics (study method,country, emergency type, emergency phase, at-risk population) and study findings (in narrative form) were extracted fromindividual studies. The findings were synthesized within methodological streams and evaluated for certainty and confidence.These within-method findings were next synthesized across methodological streams to develop an overarching synthesisof findings. The findings showed that country coverage focused on high and middle-income countries in Asia, Europe,North America, and Oceania, and the event most covered was infectious disease followed by flood and earthquake. Thefindings also showed that uncertainty in public health emergency events is a multi-faceted concept with multiple components.There is universal agreement, with some exceptions, that communication to the public should include explicit informationabout event uncertainties, and this information must be consistent and presented in an easy to understand format. Additionally,uncertainty related to events requires a distinction between uncertainty information and uncertainty experience. At-riskpopulations experience event uncertainty in lives full of uncertainties from other sources. Event uncertainty is experiencedand uncertainty information may be understood and misunderstood in the same general ways by the public, experts, andpolicy makers. Experience of event uncertainty may be a defining feature for media professionals as well due to contradictoryand inconsistent information in the environment.
KW - Uncertainty
KW - Risk communication
KW - Disaster communication
KW - Public health emergency events
U2 - 10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.019
DO - 10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.019
M3 - Review article
VL - 7
SP - 67
EP - 108
JO - Review of Communication Research
JF - Review of Communication Research
SN - 2255-4165
ER -