Comparing the performance of the Mellor-Yamada and the k-epsilon two-equation turbulence models

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Comparing the performance of the Mellor-Yamada and the k-epsilon two-equation turbulence models. / Burchard, Hans; Pederson, Ole; Rippeth, Tom.
In: Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, Vol. 103, No. C5, 15.05.1998, p. 10543-10554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Burchard, H, Pederson, O & Rippeth, T 1998, 'Comparing the performance of the Mellor-Yamada and the k-epsilon two-equation turbulence models', Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, vol. 103, no. C5, pp. 10543-10554. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC00261

APA

Burchard, H., Pederson, O., & Rippeth, T. (1998). Comparing the performance of the Mellor-Yamada and the k-epsilon two-equation turbulence models. Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 103(C5), 10543-10554. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC00261

CBE

Burchard H, Pederson O, Rippeth T. 1998. Comparing the performance of the Mellor-Yamada and the k-epsilon two-equation turbulence models. Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans. 103(C5):10543-10554. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC00261

MLA

Burchard, Hans, Ole Pederson, and Tom Rippeth. "Comparing the performance of the Mellor-Yamada and the k-epsilon two-equation turbulence models". Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans. 1998, 103(C5). 10543-10554. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC00261

VancouverVancouver

Burchard H, Pederson O, Rippeth T. Comparing the performance of the Mellor-Yamada and the k-epsilon two-equation turbulence models. Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans. 1998 May 15;103(C5):10543-10554. doi: 10.1029/98JC00261

Author

Burchard, Hans ; Pederson, Ole ; Rippeth, Tom. / Comparing the performance of the Mellor-Yamada and the k-epsilon two-equation turbulence models. In: Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans. 1998 ; Vol. 103, No. C5. pp. 10543-10554.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the performance of the Mellor-Yamada and the k-epsilon two-equation turbulence models

AU - Burchard, Hans

AU - Pederson, Ole

AU - Rippeth, Tom

PY - 1998/5/15

Y1 - 1998/5/15

N2 - The aim of this paper is to systematically compare k-epsilon and Mellor-Yamada two-equation turbulence models. Both models include prognostic equations for turbulent kinetic energy and a length scale related parameter which are used to calculate eddy viscosities and vertical diffusivities. The results from laboratory experiments, using mixed and stratified flows, are simulated in order to systematically compare and calibrate the models. It is shown that the Monin-Obukhov similarity theory is well represented in both models. The models are used to simulate stratified tidal flow in the Irish Sea, and the results show that the k-epsilon models generally predict a larger phase lag between currents and turbulent dissipation, in the bottom boundary layer, than the Mellor-Yamada models. The comparison between the model results and field measurements, of the rate of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy, shows that both models require modification through the inclusion of an internal wave parameterization in order that they are able to correctly predict the observed levels of turbulent dissipation. As the main result, it is shown that the choice of the stability functions, which are used as proportionality factors for calculating the eddy viscosity and diffusivity, has a stronger influence on the performance of the turbulence model than does the choice of length scale related equation.

AB - The aim of this paper is to systematically compare k-epsilon and Mellor-Yamada two-equation turbulence models. Both models include prognostic equations for turbulent kinetic energy and a length scale related parameter which are used to calculate eddy viscosities and vertical diffusivities. The results from laboratory experiments, using mixed and stratified flows, are simulated in order to systematically compare and calibrate the models. It is shown that the Monin-Obukhov similarity theory is well represented in both models. The models are used to simulate stratified tidal flow in the Irish Sea, and the results show that the k-epsilon models generally predict a larger phase lag between currents and turbulent dissipation, in the bottom boundary layer, than the Mellor-Yamada models. The comparison between the model results and field measurements, of the rate of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy, shows that both models require modification through the inclusion of an internal wave parameterization in order that they are able to correctly predict the observed levels of turbulent dissipation. As the main result, it is shown that the choice of the stability functions, which are used as proportionality factors for calculating the eddy viscosity and diffusivity, has a stronger influence on the performance of the turbulence model than does the choice of length scale related equation.

U2 - 10.1029/98JC00261

DO - 10.1029/98JC00261

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 10543

EP - 10554

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans

SN - 2169-9291

IS - C5

ER -