Comparison of multiple gene expression platforms for measuring a bladder cancer hypoxia signature

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Electronic versions

Documents

  • Tim Smith
  • Brian Lane
    University of Manchester
  • Elisabet More
    University of Manchester
  • Helen Valentine
    University of Manchester
  • Sapna Lunj
    University of Manchester
  • Omneya Abdelkarem
    Alexandria University
  • Joely Irlam-Jones
    University of Manchester
  • Rekaya Shabbir
    Manchester University
  • Helen Denley
    Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust
  • Kimberley Reeves
    University of Manchester
  • Peter Hoskin
    University of Manchester
  • Ananya Choudhury
    University of Manchester
  • Catharine West
    University of Manchester
Tumour hypoxia status provides prognostic informa‑
tion and predicts response to hypoxia‑modifying treatments. A
previous study by our group derived a 24‑gene signature to
assess hypoxia in bladder cancer. The objectives of the present
study were to compare platforms for generating signature
scores, identify cut‑off values for prospective studies, assess
intra‑tumour heterogeneity and confirm hypoxia relevance.
Briefly, RNA was extracted from prospectively collected diag‑
nostic biopsies of muscle invasive bladder cancer (51 patients),
and gene expression was measured using customised Taqman
Low Density Array (TLDA) cards, NanoString and Clariom
S arrays. Cross‑platform transferability of the gene signature
was assessed using regression and concordance analysis. The
cut‑off values were the cohort median expression values.
Intra‑ and inter‑tumour variability were determined in a
retrospective patient cohort (n=51) with multiple blocks (2‑18)
from the same tumour. To demonstrate relevance, bladder
cancer cell lines were exposed to hypoxia (0.1% oxygen,
24 h), and extracted RNA was run on custom TLDA cards.
Hypoxia scores (HS) values showed good agreement between
platforms: Clariom S vs. TLDA (r=0.72, P<0.0001; concor‑
dance 73%); Clariom S vs. NanoString (r=0.84, P<0.0001;
78%); TLDA vs. NanoString (r=0.80, P<0.0001; 78%). Cut‑off
values were 0.047 (TLDA), 7.328 (NanoString) and 6.667
(Clariom S). Intra‑tumour heterogeneity in gene expression and
HS (coefficient of variation 3.9%) was less than inter‑tumour
(7.9%) variability. HS values were higher in bladder cancer
cells exposed to hypoxia compared with normoxia (P<0.02).
In conclusion, the present study revealed that application of
the 24‑gene bladder cancer hypoxia signature was platform
agnostic, cut‑off values determined prospectively can be used
in a clinical trial, intra‑tumour heterogeneity was low and the
signature was sensitive to changes in oxygen levels in vitro.
Original languageEnglish
Article number261
Number of pages8
JournalMolecular Medicine Reports
Volume26
Issue number2
Early online date20 Jun 2022
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Jun 2022
View graph of relations