Conceptual relation preference: A matter of strategy or one of salience?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Conceptual relation preference: A matter of strategy or one of salience? / Olivera, Savic; Thierry, Guillaume; Kovic, Vanja.
In: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 204, 103018, 03.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Olivera S, Thierry G, Kovic V. Conceptual relation preference: A matter of strategy or one of salience? Acta Psychologica. 2020 Mar;204:103018. Epub 2020 Feb 18. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103018

Author

Olivera, Savic ; Thierry, Guillaume ; Kovic, Vanja. / Conceptual relation preference: A matter of strategy or one of salience?. In: Acta Psychologica. 2020 ; Vol. 204.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptual relation preference: A matter of strategy or one of salience?

AU - Olivera, Savic

AU - Thierry, Guillaume

AU - Kovic, Vanja

PY - 2020/3

Y1 - 2020/3

N2 - In order to determine whether preference in object matching tasks measures participants’ strategy or tells us something about the salience of relations between corresponding concepts, we conducted three experiments. In Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, we approached this question by measuring the ease with which adult participants process different relations when they are under strategic instruction. When asked to group objects based on thematic or taxonomic relatedness, participants were slower (Experiment 2) and tended to make more errors (Experiment 1-2) when they had to find a taxonomically related pair than when they searched for a thematically related one. In Experiment 3, participants performed a standard matching task and their eye-movements were monitored throughout. In addition to the strong thematic preference in participants’ choices, we measured longer fixations to thematically related objects than taxonomic competitors. Even though thematic and taxonomic information appear to compete for selection in early phases of observation, thematic conceptual relations appear to be more salient and preferred, independently of instruction.

AB - In order to determine whether preference in object matching tasks measures participants’ strategy or tells us something about the salience of relations between corresponding concepts, we conducted three experiments. In Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, we approached this question by measuring the ease with which adult participants process different relations when they are under strategic instruction. When asked to group objects based on thematic or taxonomic relatedness, participants were slower (Experiment 2) and tended to make more errors (Experiment 1-2) when they had to find a taxonomically related pair than when they searched for a thematically related one. In Experiment 3, participants performed a standard matching task and their eye-movements were monitored throughout. In addition to the strong thematic preference in participants’ choices, we measured longer fixations to thematically related objects than taxonomic competitors. Even though thematic and taxonomic information appear to compete for selection in early phases of observation, thematic conceptual relations appear to be more salient and preferred, independently of instruction.

KW - Matching-to-sample task

KW - Thematic relations

KW - Taxonomic relations

KW - Eye tracking

KW - Thematic preference

U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103018

DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103018

M3 - Article

VL - 204

JO - Acta Psychologica

JF - Acta Psychologica

SN - 0001-6918

M1 - 103018

ER -