Conceptual relation preference: A matter of strategy or one of salience?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 204, 103018, 03.2020.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Conceptual relation preference: A matter of strategy or one of salience?
AU - Olivera, Savic
AU - Thierry, Guillaume
AU - Kovic, Vanja
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - In order to determine whether preference in object matching tasks measures participants’ strategy or tells us something about the salience of relations between corresponding concepts, we conducted three experiments. In Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, we approached this question by measuring the ease with which adult participants process different relations when they are under strategic instruction. When asked to group objects based on thematic or taxonomic relatedness, participants were slower (Experiment 2) and tended to make more errors (Experiment 1-2) when they had to find a taxonomically related pair than when they searched for a thematically related one. In Experiment 3, participants performed a standard matching task and their eye-movements were monitored throughout. In addition to the strong thematic preference in participants’ choices, we measured longer fixations to thematically related objects than taxonomic competitors. Even though thematic and taxonomic information appear to compete for selection in early phases of observation, thematic conceptual relations appear to be more salient and preferred, independently of instruction.
AB - In order to determine whether preference in object matching tasks measures participants’ strategy or tells us something about the salience of relations between corresponding concepts, we conducted three experiments. In Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, we approached this question by measuring the ease with which adult participants process different relations when they are under strategic instruction. When asked to group objects based on thematic or taxonomic relatedness, participants were slower (Experiment 2) and tended to make more errors (Experiment 1-2) when they had to find a taxonomically related pair than when they searched for a thematically related one. In Experiment 3, participants performed a standard matching task and their eye-movements were monitored throughout. In addition to the strong thematic preference in participants’ choices, we measured longer fixations to thematically related objects than taxonomic competitors. Even though thematic and taxonomic information appear to compete for selection in early phases of observation, thematic conceptual relations appear to be more salient and preferred, independently of instruction.
KW - Matching-to-sample task
KW - Thematic relations
KW - Taxonomic relations
KW - Eye tracking
KW - Thematic preference
U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103018
DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103018
M3 - Article
VL - 204
JO - Acta Psychologica
JF - Acta Psychologica
SN - 0001-6918
M1 - 103018
ER -