Correspondence analysis: a case for methodological pluralism.
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
Standard Standard
Correspondence analysis: a case for methodological pluralism. / Jones, I.R.; Williams, M. (Editor); Vogt, W.P. (Editor).
Sage Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods. 2011. ed. SAGE Publications, 2011. p. 139-149.
Sage Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods. 2011. ed. SAGE Publications, 2011. p. 139-149.
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
HarvardHarvard
Jones, IR, Williams, M (ed.) & Vogt, WP (ed.) 2011, Correspondence analysis: a case for methodological pluralism. in Sage Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods. 2011 edn, SAGE Publications, pp. 139-149.
APA
Jones, I. R., Williams, M. (Ed.), & Vogt, W. P. (Ed.) (2011). Correspondence analysis: a case for methodological pluralism. In Sage Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods (2011 ed., pp. 139-149). SAGE Publications.
CBE
Jones IR, Williams M, Vogt WP, ed. 2011. Correspondence analysis: a case for methodological pluralism. In Sage Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods. 2011 ed. SAGE Publications. pp. 139-149.
MLA
Jones, I.R., M. Williams and W.P. Vogt, ed. "Correspondence analysis: a case for methodological pluralism.". Sage Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods. 2011 udg., SAGE Publications. 2011, 139-149.
VancouverVancouver
Jones IR, Williams M, (ed.), Vogt WP, (ed.). Correspondence analysis: a case for methodological pluralism. In Sage Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods. 2011 ed. SAGE Publications. 2011. p. 139-149
Author
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Correspondence analysis: a case for methodological pluralism.
AU - Jones, I.R.
A2 - Williams, M.
A2 - Vogt, W.P.
PY - 2011/1/1
Y1 - 2011/1/1
M3 - Chapter
SN - 1412946484
SP - 139
EP - 149
BT - Sage Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods
PB - SAGE Publications
ER -