Cost-Effectiveness and Cost–Benefit Analyses of Providing Menstrual Cups and Sanitary Pads to Schoolgirls in Rural Kenya
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Women's Health Reports, Vol. 3, No. 1, 15.09.2022, p. 773-784.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-Effectiveness and Cost–Benefit Analyses of Providing Menstrual Cups and Sanitary Pads to Schoolgirls in Rural Kenya
AU - Babagoli, Masih
AU - Benshaul-Tolonen, Anja
AU - Zulaika, Garazi
AU - Nyothach, Elizabeth
AU - Oduor, Clifford
AU - Obor, David
AU - Mason , Linda
AU - Kerubo, Emily
AU - Ngere, Isaac
AU - Laserson, Kayla
AU - Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
AU - Phillips-Howard, Penelope
PY - 2022/9/15
Y1 - 2022/9/15
N2 - Objective: To analyze the relative value of providing menstrual cups and sanitary pads to primary schoolgirls.Design: Cost-effectiveness and cost–benefit analyses of three-arm single-site open cluster randomized controlled pilot study providing menstrual cups or sanitary pads for 1 year.Participants: Girls 14–16 years of age enrolled across 30 primary schools in rural western Kenya.Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted based on the health effects (reductions in disability-adjusted life years [DALYs]) and education effects (reductions in school absenteeism) of both interventions. The health and education benefits were separately valued and compared with relative program costs.Results: Compared with the control group, the cost of menstrual cups was estimated at $3,270 per year for 1000 girls, compared with $24,000 for sanitary pads. The benefit of the menstrual cup program (1.4 DALYs averted, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −4.3 to 3.1) was higher compared with a sanitary pad program (0.48 DALYs averted, 95% CI: −4.2 to 2.3), but the health effects of both interventions were not statistically significant likely due to the limited statistical power. Using point estimates, the menstrual cup intervention was cost-effective in improving health outcomes ($2,300/DALY averted). The sanitary pad intervention had a cost-effectiveness of $300/student-school year in reducing school absenteeism. When considering improvements in future earnings from reduced absenteeism, the sanitary pad program had a net benefit of +$68,000 (95% CI: −$32,000 to +$169,000).Conclusions: The menstrual cup may provide a cost-effective solution for menstrual hygiene management in low-income settings. This study outlines a methodology for future analyses of menstrual hygiene interventions and highlights several knowledge gaps that need to be addressed. Trial registration: ISRCTN17486946.
AB - Objective: To analyze the relative value of providing menstrual cups and sanitary pads to primary schoolgirls.Design: Cost-effectiveness and cost–benefit analyses of three-arm single-site open cluster randomized controlled pilot study providing menstrual cups or sanitary pads for 1 year.Participants: Girls 14–16 years of age enrolled across 30 primary schools in rural western Kenya.Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted based on the health effects (reductions in disability-adjusted life years [DALYs]) and education effects (reductions in school absenteeism) of both interventions. The health and education benefits were separately valued and compared with relative program costs.Results: Compared with the control group, the cost of menstrual cups was estimated at $3,270 per year for 1000 girls, compared with $24,000 for sanitary pads. The benefit of the menstrual cup program (1.4 DALYs averted, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −4.3 to 3.1) was higher compared with a sanitary pad program (0.48 DALYs averted, 95% CI: −4.2 to 2.3), but the health effects of both interventions were not statistically significant likely due to the limited statistical power. Using point estimates, the menstrual cup intervention was cost-effective in improving health outcomes ($2,300/DALY averted). The sanitary pad intervention had a cost-effectiveness of $300/student-school year in reducing school absenteeism. When considering improvements in future earnings from reduced absenteeism, the sanitary pad program had a net benefit of +$68,000 (95% CI: −$32,000 to +$169,000).Conclusions: The menstrual cup may provide a cost-effective solution for menstrual hygiene management in low-income settings. This study outlines a methodology for future analyses of menstrual hygiene interventions and highlights several knowledge gaps that need to be addressed. Trial registration: ISRCTN17486946.
KW - adolescence
KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis
KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis
KW - menstrual cup
KW - menstrual health
KW - randomized trial
KW - sanitary pads
U2 - 10.1089/whr.2021.0131
DO - 10.1089/whr.2021.0131
M3 - Article
C2 - 36185073
VL - 3
SP - 773
EP - 784
JO - Women's Health Reports
JF - Women's Health Reports
SN - 2688-4844
IS - 1
ER -