Counterfactual thinking affects the excitability of the motor cortex
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Cortex, Vol. 65, 23.01.2015, p. 139-148.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Counterfactual thinking affects the excitability of the motor cortex
AU - Vicario, C.M.
AU - Rafal, R.D.
AU - Avenanti, A.
PY - 2015/1/23
Y1 - 2015/1/23
N2 - Evidence suggests that monetary reward and affective experiences induce activity in the cortical motor system. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether counterfactual thinking related to wrong choices that lead to monetary loss and regret affects motor excitability. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex, we measured corticospinal excitability of 2 groups of healthy humans asked to actively guess the winning key among two possible alternatives (choice group); or passively assist to monetary outcomes randomly selected by the computer program (follow group). Results document a selective increment of the corticospinal excitability when a monetary loss outcome followed the key selection (i.e., in the choice group). On the other hand, no change in corticospinal excitability was found when participants passively assisted to a monetary loss randomly selected by the computer program (i.e., follow group). These findings suggest that counterfactual thinking and the negative emotional experiences arising from choices causing monetary loss – i.e., “I would have won instead of lost money if I'd made a different choice” – are mapped in the motor system.
AB - Evidence suggests that monetary reward and affective experiences induce activity in the cortical motor system. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether counterfactual thinking related to wrong choices that lead to monetary loss and regret affects motor excitability. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex, we measured corticospinal excitability of 2 groups of healthy humans asked to actively guess the winning key among two possible alternatives (choice group); or passively assist to monetary outcomes randomly selected by the computer program (follow group). Results document a selective increment of the corticospinal excitability when a monetary loss outcome followed the key selection (i.e., in the choice group). On the other hand, no change in corticospinal excitability was found when participants passively assisted to a monetary loss randomly selected by the computer program (i.e., follow group). These findings suggest that counterfactual thinking and the negative emotional experiences arising from choices causing monetary loss – i.e., “I would have won instead of lost money if I'd made a different choice” – are mapped in the motor system.
U2 - 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.12.017
DO - 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.12.017
M3 - Article
VL - 65
SP - 139
EP - 148
JO - Cortex
JF - Cortex
SN - 0010-9452
ER -