Standard Standard

Critical perspectives on environmental protection in non-international armed conflict: Developing the principles of distinction, proportionality and necessity. / Smith, Tara.
In: Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 32, No. 4, 12.2019, p. 759-779.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Smith T. Critical perspectives on environmental protection in non-international armed conflict: Developing the principles of distinction, proportionality and necessity. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2019 Dec;32(4):759-779. Epub 2019 Sept 13. doi: 10.1017/S0922156519000372

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical perspectives on environmental protection in non-international armed conflict: Developing the principles of distinction, proportionality and necessity

AU - Smith, Tara

N1 - The final version of this article has been published in the Leiden Journal of International Law (LJIL) and can be found online at journals.cambridge.org/ljil

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - The extent to which customary international laws of armed conflict protect the environment in non-international armed conflict has received very little critical attention to date when compared to the growing body of scholarship that examines the treaty-based environmental laws of international armed conflict. This article presents the first critical examination of the principles of distinction, proportionality, and the doctrine of military necessity and the extent to which they can be better interpreted to protect the environment during the conduct of hostilities in non-international armed conflict. In so doing, this article fills a key gap in understanding and knowledge and it moves the debate forward by suggesting ways in which the International Law Commission might develop more ambitious draft principles in their current programme of work.

AB - The extent to which customary international laws of armed conflict protect the environment in non-international armed conflict has received very little critical attention to date when compared to the growing body of scholarship that examines the treaty-based environmental laws of international armed conflict. This article presents the first critical examination of the principles of distinction, proportionality, and the doctrine of military necessity and the extent to which they can be better interpreted to protect the environment during the conduct of hostilities in non-international armed conflict. In so doing, this article fills a key gap in understanding and knowledge and it moves the debate forward by suggesting ways in which the International Law Commission might develop more ambitious draft principles in their current programme of work.

KW - International Law Commission

KW - customary international law

KW - environment

KW - non-international armed conflict

U2 - 10.1017/S0922156519000372

DO - 10.1017/S0922156519000372

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 759

EP - 779

JO - Leiden Journal of International Law

JF - Leiden Journal of International Law

SN - 0922-1565

IS - 4

ER -