Dental RECUR randomised trial to prevent caries re-occurrence in children
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 99, No. 2, 02.2020, p. 168-174.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Dental RECUR randomised trial to prevent caries re-occurrence in children
AU - Pine, Cynthia
AU - Adair, Pauline
AU - Burnside, Girvan
AU - Brennan, Louise
AU - Sutton, L.
AU - Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
AU - Ezeofor, Victory
AU - Albadri, Saldos
AU - Curnow, Morag
AU - Deery, Chris
AU - Hosey, Marie-Therese
AU - Willis-Lake, J.
AU - Lynn, J.
AU - Parry, Jennifer
AU - Wong, F.S.L.
N1 - Copyright 2019 SAGE. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - OBJECTIVES: to determine the efficacy of a dental nurse-delivered intervention, the Dental Recur Brief Negotiated Interview for Oral Health (DR-BNI), in reducing the re-occurrence of dental caries in children who had a primary tooth extracted two years previously. METHOD: Two-arm, multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT), with blinded outcome assessment. 12 Centres in the UK; n=241, 5-7 year-old children scheduled to have primary teeth extracted. Test intervention (n=119): DR-BNI informed by motivational interviewing (MI). 30-minute structured conversation with parents led by trained dental nurses. Forward focus to prevent caries in future. Preventive goals agreed, review appointment made with general dental practice (GDP). GDP advised to treat child as high caries-risk. Control intervention (n=122): conversation about future eruption of permanent teeth, advised attend GDP as usual. Baseline: mean dmft 6.8 in DR-BNI group, 6.3 in control, median 5 teeth extracted, mainly under general anaesthesia. RESULTS: Final dental assessments by a single examiner visiting 189 schools two years after intervention; 193 (80%) of 241 children examined. 62% in control group developed new caries in teeth that were caries free or unerupted at baseline. In the test group, this was 44%, a significant reduction (p=0.021). The odds of new caries experience occurring were reduced by 51% in the DR-BNI group compared to control. Relative risk: 29% decrease in the risk of new caries experience in the DR-BNI group compared to control. In a wide range of high caries risk children, this single, low cost, low intensity intervention was successful in significantly reducing the risk of new caries experience. CONCLUSION: this trial has implications for changing paediatric dental practice internationally. Training in, and implementation of, an MI-informed brief intervention provides opportunities for dental nurses to go beyond clinical prevention to facilitate behaviour change, and to support oral health improvements for high caries risk children.
AB - OBJECTIVES: to determine the efficacy of a dental nurse-delivered intervention, the Dental Recur Brief Negotiated Interview for Oral Health (DR-BNI), in reducing the re-occurrence of dental caries in children who had a primary tooth extracted two years previously. METHOD: Two-arm, multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT), with blinded outcome assessment. 12 Centres in the UK; n=241, 5-7 year-old children scheduled to have primary teeth extracted. Test intervention (n=119): DR-BNI informed by motivational interviewing (MI). 30-minute structured conversation with parents led by trained dental nurses. Forward focus to prevent caries in future. Preventive goals agreed, review appointment made with general dental practice (GDP). GDP advised to treat child as high caries-risk. Control intervention (n=122): conversation about future eruption of permanent teeth, advised attend GDP as usual. Baseline: mean dmft 6.8 in DR-BNI group, 6.3 in control, median 5 teeth extracted, mainly under general anaesthesia. RESULTS: Final dental assessments by a single examiner visiting 189 schools two years after intervention; 193 (80%) of 241 children examined. 62% in control group developed new caries in teeth that were caries free or unerupted at baseline. In the test group, this was 44%, a significant reduction (p=0.021). The odds of new caries experience occurring were reduced by 51% in the DR-BNI group compared to control. Relative risk: 29% decrease in the risk of new caries experience in the DR-BNI group compared to control. In a wide range of high caries risk children, this single, low cost, low intensity intervention was successful in significantly reducing the risk of new caries experience. CONCLUSION: this trial has implications for changing paediatric dental practice internationally. Training in, and implementation of, an MI-informed brief intervention provides opportunities for dental nurses to go beyond clinical prevention to facilitate behaviour change, and to support oral health improvements for high caries risk children.
KW - caries detection
KW - caries treatment
KW - child dentistry
KW - clinical studies
KW - diagnosis
KW - health services research
KW - motivational interviewing
KW - prevention
KW - trials
U2 - 10.1177/0022034519886808
DO - 10.1177/0022034519886808
M3 - Article
VL - 99
SP - 168
EP - 174
JO - Journal of Dental Research
JF - Journal of Dental Research
SN - 1544-0591
IS - 2
ER -