Standard Standard

Developing Palliative Care Knowledge and Skills in a Heart Failure Team: Does it Improve Quality of Care Delivery?: Poster No. P1-122. / Welstand, Jenny; Poolman, Marlise; George, Jayan.
2015. Poster session presented at European Association for Palliative Care, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePosterpeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

Welstand J, Poolman M, George J. 2015. Developing Palliative Care Knowledge and Skills in a Heart Failure Team: Does it Improve Quality of Care Delivery?: Poster No. P1-122. Poster session presented at European Association for Palliative Care, Copenhagen, Denmark.

MLA

Welstand, Jenny, Marlise Poolman and Jayan George Developing Palliative Care Knowledge and Skills in a Heart Failure Team: Does it Improve Quality of Care Delivery?: Poster No. P1-122. European Association for Palliative Care, 08 May 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark, Poster, 2015.

VancouverVancouver

Welstand J, Poolman M, George J. Developing Palliative Care Knowledge and Skills in a Heart Failure Team: Does it Improve Quality of Care Delivery?: Poster No. P1-122. 2015. Poster session presented at European Association for Palliative Care, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Author

Welstand, Jenny ; Poolman, Marlise ; George, Jayan. / Developing Palliative Care Knowledge and Skills in a Heart Failure Team: Does it Improve Quality of Care Delivery?: Poster No. P1-122. Poster session presented at European Association for Palliative Care, Copenhagen, Denmark.

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Developing Palliative Care Knowledge and Skills in a Heart Failure Team: Does it Improve Quality of Care Delivery?: Poster No. P1-122

AU - Welstand, Jenny

AU - Poolman, Marlise

AU - George, Jayan

PY - 2015/5

Y1 - 2015/5

N2 - Background: Over the past few years, the local Heart Failure (HF) team has improved their palliative care knowledge and skills, particularly developing confidence with prognostication: this process started with joint working between the specialist palliative care (SPC) and HF teams on a ‘Principles of good palliative care’ project in 2010. Prior to the project, the HF team undertook a documentation audit to review their management of the palliative care needs of their patients. Teaching sessions followed, with subsequent time to embed into practice the principles of good palliative care, including optimising communication with primary care regarding needs and likely prognosis.Aims: We set out to understand better whether the HF team’s journey resulted in good quality palliative care delivery to their patients.Methods: We first closed the audit loop to ascertain whether the clinical records evidence any change in practice, and then set up a sequential focus group study with the HF team to understand in what ways their practice has changed and how this impacts on quality of care delivery.Results and discussion: Qualitative analysis is ongoing but seems to suggest significant changes in how the team now approaches and coordinates patient care, and provides insight into how this translates into quality of care. We will present the findings of the audits (pre- and post intervention) as well as the finalanalysis of the focus group study. We will specifically consider how team culture influences quality of care delivery.

AB - Background: Over the past few years, the local Heart Failure (HF) team has improved their palliative care knowledge and skills, particularly developing confidence with prognostication: this process started with joint working between the specialist palliative care (SPC) and HF teams on a ‘Principles of good palliative care’ project in 2010. Prior to the project, the HF team undertook a documentation audit to review their management of the palliative care needs of their patients. Teaching sessions followed, with subsequent time to embed into practice the principles of good palliative care, including optimising communication with primary care regarding needs and likely prognosis.Aims: We set out to understand better whether the HF team’s journey resulted in good quality palliative care delivery to their patients.Methods: We first closed the audit loop to ascertain whether the clinical records evidence any change in practice, and then set up a sequential focus group study with the HF team to understand in what ways their practice has changed and how this impacts on quality of care delivery.Results and discussion: Qualitative analysis is ongoing but seems to suggest significant changes in how the team now approaches and coordinates patient care, and provides insight into how this translates into quality of care. We will present the findings of the audits (pre- and post intervention) as well as the finalanalysis of the focus group study. We will specifically consider how team culture influences quality of care delivery.

M3 - Poster

T2 - European Association for Palliative Care

Y2 - 8 May 2015 through 10 May 2015

ER -