Development of an evidence-based complex intervention for community rehabilitation of patients with hip fracture using realist review, survey and focus groups
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: BMJ Open, Vol. 7, No. 10, e014362, 11.10.2017.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of an evidence-based complex intervention for community rehabilitation of patients with hip fracture using realist review, survey and focus groups
AU - Roberts, Jessica Louise
AU - Din, Nafees Ud
AU - Williams, Michelle
AU - Hawkes, Claire
AU - Charles, Joanna
AU - Hoare, Zoe
AU - Morrison, Val
AU - Alexander, Swapna
AU - Lemmey, Andrew
AU - Sackley, Catherine
AU - Logan, Phillipa
AU - Wilkinson, Clare
AU - Rycroft-Malone, Jo
AU - Williams, Nefyn
N1 - © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
PY - 2017/10/11
Y1 - 2017/10/11
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To develop an evidence and theory-based complex intervention for improving outcomes in elderly patients following hip fracture.DESIGN: Complex-intervention development (Medical Research Council (MRC) framework phase I) using realist literature review, surveys and focus groups of patients and rehabilitation teams.SETTING: North Wales.PARTICIPANTS: Surveys of therapy managers (n=13), community and hospital-based physiotherapists (n=129) and occupational therapists (n=68) throughout the UK. Focus groups with patients (n=13), their carers (n=4) and members of the multidisciplinary rehabilitation teams in North Wales (n=13).RESULTS: The realist review provided understanding of how rehabilitation interventions work in the real-world context and three programme theories were developed: improving patient engagement by tailoring the intervention to individual needs; reducing fear of falling and improving self-efficacy to exercise and perform activities of daily living; and coordination of rehabilitation delivery. The survey provided context about usual rehabilitation practice; focus groups provided data on the experience, acceptability and feasibility of rehabilitation interventions. An intervention to enhance usual rehabilitation was developed to target these theory areas comprising: a physical component consisting of six additional therapy sessions; and a psychological component consisting of a workbook to enhance self-efficacy and a patient-held goal-setting diary for self-monitoring.CONCLUSIONS: A realist approach may have advantages in the development of evidence-based interventions and can be used in conjunction with other established methods to contribute to the development of potentially more effective interventions. A rehabilitation intervention was developed which can be tested in a future randomised controlled trial (MRC framework phases II and III).TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN22464643, Pre-results.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To develop an evidence and theory-based complex intervention for improving outcomes in elderly patients following hip fracture.DESIGN: Complex-intervention development (Medical Research Council (MRC) framework phase I) using realist literature review, surveys and focus groups of patients and rehabilitation teams.SETTING: North Wales.PARTICIPANTS: Surveys of therapy managers (n=13), community and hospital-based physiotherapists (n=129) and occupational therapists (n=68) throughout the UK. Focus groups with patients (n=13), their carers (n=4) and members of the multidisciplinary rehabilitation teams in North Wales (n=13).RESULTS: The realist review provided understanding of how rehabilitation interventions work in the real-world context and three programme theories were developed: improving patient engagement by tailoring the intervention to individual needs; reducing fear of falling and improving self-efficacy to exercise and perform activities of daily living; and coordination of rehabilitation delivery. The survey provided context about usual rehabilitation practice; focus groups provided data on the experience, acceptability and feasibility of rehabilitation interventions. An intervention to enhance usual rehabilitation was developed to target these theory areas comprising: a physical component consisting of six additional therapy sessions; and a psychological component consisting of a workbook to enhance self-efficacy and a patient-held goal-setting diary for self-monitoring.CONCLUSIONS: A realist approach may have advantages in the development of evidence-based interventions and can be used in conjunction with other established methods to contribute to the development of potentially more effective interventions. A rehabilitation intervention was developed which can be tested in a future randomised controlled trial (MRC framework phases II and III).TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN22464643, Pre-results.
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014362
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014362
M3 - Article
C2 - 29025824
VL - 7
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
SN - 2044-6055
IS - 10
M1 - e014362
ER -