Development of an intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis through primary care: a protocol
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 2, No. 3, bjgpopen18X101595, 10.2018.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of an intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis through primary care
T2 - a protocol
AU - Stanciu, Marian Andrei
AU - Law, Rebecca-Jane
AU - Nafees, Sadia
AU - Hendry, Margaret
AU - Yeo, Seow Tien
AU - Hiscock, Julia
AU - Lewis, Ruth
AU - Edwards, Rhiannon
AU - Williams, Nefyn
AU - Brain, Katherine
AU - Brocklehurst, Paul
AU - Carson-Stevens, Andrew
AU - Dolwani, Sunil
AU - Emery, Jon
AU - Hamilton, William
AU - Hoare, Zoe
AU - Lyratzopoulos, Georgios
AU - Rubin, Greg
AU - Smits, Stephanie
AU - Vedsted, Peter
AU - Walter, Fiona
AU - Wilkinson, Clare
AU - Neal, Richard
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Background GPs can play an important role in achieving earlier cancer diagnosis to improve patient outcomes, for example through prompt use of the urgent suspected cancer referral pathway. Barriers to early diagnosis include individual practitioner variation in knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, professional expectations, and norms. Aim This programme of work (Wales Interventions and Cancer Knowledge about Early Diagnosis [WICKED]) will develop a behaviour change intervention to expedite diagnosis through primary care and contribute to improved cancer outcomes. Design & setting Non-experimental mixed-method study with GPs and primary care practice teams from Wales. Method Four work packages will inform the development of the behaviour change intervention. Work package 1 will identify relevant evidence-based interventions (systematic review of reviews) and will determine why interventions do or do not work, for whom, and in what circumstances (realist review). Work package 2 will assess cancer knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour of GPs, as well as primary care teams’ perspectives on cancer referral and investigation (GP survey, discrete choice experiment [DCE], interviews, and focus groups). Work package 3 will synthesise findings from earlier work packages using the behaviour change wheel as an overarching theoretical framework to guide intervention development. Work package 4 will test the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, and determine methods for measuring costs and effects of subsequent behaviour change in a randomised feasibility trial. Results The findings will inform the design of a future effectiveness trial, with concurrent economic evaluation, aimed at earlier diagnosis. Conclusion This comprehensive, evidence-based programme will develop a complex GP behaviour change intervention to expedite the diagnosis of symptomatic cancer, and may be applicable to countries with similar healthcare systems.
AB - Background GPs can play an important role in achieving earlier cancer diagnosis to improve patient outcomes, for example through prompt use of the urgent suspected cancer referral pathway. Barriers to early diagnosis include individual practitioner variation in knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, professional expectations, and norms. Aim This programme of work (Wales Interventions and Cancer Knowledge about Early Diagnosis [WICKED]) will develop a behaviour change intervention to expedite diagnosis through primary care and contribute to improved cancer outcomes. Design & setting Non-experimental mixed-method study with GPs and primary care practice teams from Wales. Method Four work packages will inform the development of the behaviour change intervention. Work package 1 will identify relevant evidence-based interventions (systematic review of reviews) and will determine why interventions do or do not work, for whom, and in what circumstances (realist review). Work package 2 will assess cancer knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour of GPs, as well as primary care teams’ perspectives on cancer referral and investigation (GP survey, discrete choice experiment [DCE], interviews, and focus groups). Work package 3 will synthesise findings from earlier work packages using the behaviour change wheel as an overarching theoretical framework to guide intervention development. Work package 4 will test the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, and determine methods for measuring costs and effects of subsequent behaviour change in a randomised feasibility trial. Results The findings will inform the design of a future effectiveness trial, with concurrent economic evaluation, aimed at earlier diagnosis. Conclusion This comprehensive, evidence-based programme will develop a complex GP behaviour change intervention to expedite the diagnosis of symptomatic cancer, and may be applicable to countries with similar healthcare systems.
U2 - 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101595
DO - 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101595
M3 - Article
VL - 2
JO - British Journal of General Practice
JF - British Journal of General Practice
SN - 0960-1643
IS - 3
M1 - bjgpopen18X101595
ER -