Did negative interest rates improve bank lending?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of Financial Services Research, Vol. 57, No. 1, 02.2020, p. 51-68.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Did negative interest rates improve bank lending?
AU - Molyneux, Philip
AU - Reghezza, Alessio
AU - Thornton, John
AU - Xie, Ru
N1 - This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Journal of Financial Services Research. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10693-019-00322-8.
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - Since 2012 several central banks have introduced a negative interest rate policy (NIRP) aimed at boosting real spending by facilitating an increase in the supply and demand for bank loans. We employ a bank-level dataset comprising 6558 banks from 33 OECD member countries over 2012–2016 and a matched difference-in-differences estimator to analyze whether NIRP resulted in a change in bank lending in NIRP-adopter countries compared to those that did not adopt the policy. Our results suggest that following the introduction of negative interest rates, bank lending was weaker in NIRP-adopter countries. The result is robust to a wide range of checks. This adverse NIRP effect appears to have been stronger for banks that were smaller, more dependent on retail deposit funding, less well capitalized, had business models reliant on interest income, and operated in more competitive markets.
AB - Since 2012 several central banks have introduced a negative interest rate policy (NIRP) aimed at boosting real spending by facilitating an increase in the supply and demand for bank loans. We employ a bank-level dataset comprising 6558 banks from 33 OECD member countries over 2012–2016 and a matched difference-in-differences estimator to analyze whether NIRP resulted in a change in bank lending in NIRP-adopter countries compared to those that did not adopt the policy. Our results suggest that following the introduction of negative interest rates, bank lending was weaker in NIRP-adopter countries. The result is robust to a wide range of checks. This adverse NIRP effect appears to have been stronger for banks that were smaller, more dependent on retail deposit funding, less well capitalized, had business models reliant on interest income, and operated in more competitive markets.
KW - Bank lending
KW - Difference in differences estimation
KW - Monetary policy transmission
KW - Negative interest rates
KW - Propensity score matching
UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10693-019-00322-8/tables/7
U2 - 10.1007/s10693-019-00322-8
DO - 10.1007/s10693-019-00322-8
M3 - Article
VL - 57
SP - 51
EP - 68
JO - Journal of Financial Services Research
JF - Journal of Financial Services Research
SN - 0920-8550
IS - 1
ER -